Urban Green Space Accessibility and Environmental Quality toward Mental Well-Being among Residents of Tangerang

Authors

  • Apriyanto Apriyanto Politeknik Tunas Pemuda Tangerang
  • Bintang Cahya Universitas Nusa Putra
  • Ilham Akbar Bunyamin Universitas Nusa Putra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsnt.v4i03.3154

Keywords:

Urban Green Spaces, Accessibility, Environmental Quality, Mental Well-Being, Tangerang

Abstract

Urban green spaces are increasingly recognized as an important component of sustainable urban development because of their potential contribution to environmental quality and psychological well-being. This study examines the relationship between accessibility of urban green spaces, environmental quality, and mental well-being among residents of Tangerang. A quantitative approach was employed using a cross-sectional survey involving 75 respondents. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire measured on a five-point Likert scale and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25. The analysis included validity and reliability testing, descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, Pearson correlation, multiple linear regression, t-tests, F-tests, and the coefficient of determination. The results indicate that accessibility of urban green spaces has a positive and significant relationship with mental well-being. Environmental quality also demonstrates a positive and significant relationship with mental well-being. Simultaneously, both variables significantly explain variations in mental well-being. These findings suggest that accessible and high-quality urban green environments are associated with better psychological well-being among Tangerang residents. The study highlights the importance of integrating accessibility, environmental maintenance, safety, comfort, and green-space quality into urban planning and public-health strategies.

References

[1] A. Ventriglio, J. Torales, J. M. Castaldelli-Maia, D. De Berardis, and D. Bhugra, “Urbanization and emerging mental health issues,” CNS Spectrums, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2021, doi: 10.1017/S1092852920001236.

[2] A. E. Terefe and Y. Hou, “Determinants influencing the accessibility and use of urban green spaces: A review of empirical evidence,” City and Environment Interactions, vol. 24, Art. no. 100159, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cacint.2024.100159.

[3] R. Setiowati, R. H. Koestoer, K. Mizuno, and H. S. Hasibuan, “Urban green space during the Coronavirus disease pandemic with regard to the socioeconomic characteristics,” Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 589–606, 2023, doi: 10.22034/gjesm.2023.03.15.

[4] L. Wood, P. Hooper, S. Foster, and F. Bull, “Public green spaces and positive mental health – investigating the relationship between access, quantity and types of parks and mental wellbeing,” Health & Place, vol. 48, pp. 63–71, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.002.

[5] H. Li, N. Ta, B. Yu, and J. Wu, “Are the accessibility and facility environment of parks associated with mental health? A comparative analysis based on residential areas and workplaces,” Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 237, Art. no. 104807, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104807.

[6] P.-Y. Nguyen, T. Astell-Burt, H. Rahimi-Ardabili, and X. Feng, “Green space quality and health: A systematic review,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 21, Art. no. 11028, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111028.

[7] H. Park, C. D. Brown, and A. L. Pearson, “A systematic review of audit tools for evaluating the quality of green spaces in mental health research,” Health & Place, vol. 86, Art. no. 103185, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103185.

[8] G. N. Bratman et al., “Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective,” Science Advances, vol. 5, no. 7, Art. no. eaax0903, 2019, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax0903.

[9] S. Huang, J. Qi, W. Li, J. Dong, and C. K. van den Bosch, “The contribution to stress recovery and attention restoration potential of exposure to urban green spaces in low-density residential areas,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 16, Art. no. 8713, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168713.

[10] V. Jennings and O. Bamkole, “The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: An avenue for health promotion,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 16, no. 3, Art. no. 452, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030452.

[11] S. M. Labib, S. Lindley, and J. J. Huck, “Spatial dimensions of the influence of urban green-blue spaces on human health: A systematic review,” Environmental Research, vol. 180, Art. no. 108869, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108869.

[12] V. Houlden, S. Weich, J. Porto de Albuquerque, S. Jarvis, and K. Rees, “The relationship between greenspace and the mental wellbeing of adults: A systematic review,” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 9, Art. no. e0203000, 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203000.

[13] R. Wang, Z. Feng, J. Pearce, Y. Liu, and G. Dong, “Are greenspace quantity and quality associated with mental health through different mechanisms in Guangzhou, China: A comparison study using street view data,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 290, Art. no. 117976, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117976.

[14] Z. Xu, S. Marini, M. Mauro, P. Maietta Latessa, A. Grigoletto, and S. Toselli, “Associations between urban green space quality and mental wellbeing: Systematic review,” Land, vol. 14, no. 2, Art. no. 381, 2025, doi: 10.3390/land14020381.

[15] R. Setiowati and R. H. Koestoer, “Valuation of urban green open spaces using the life satisfaction approach,” Civil Engineering Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-04-010.

[16] M. C. Kondo, J. M. Fluehr, T. McKeon, and C. C. Branas, “Urban green space and its impact on human health,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 15, no. 3, Art. no. 445, 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030445.

[17] M. P. Jimenez et al., “Associations between nature exposure and health: A review of the evidence,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 9, Art. no. 4790, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094790.

[18] K. S. Taber, “The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education,” Research in Science Education, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1273–1296, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.

[19] I. Markevych et al., “Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance,” Environmental Research, vol. 158, pp. 301–317, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028.

[20] K. Chen, T. Zhang, F. Liu, Y. Zhang, and Y. Song, “How does urban green space impact residents' mental health: A literature review of mediators,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 22, Art. no. 11746, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211746.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Urban Green Space Accessibility and Environmental Quality toward Mental Well-Being among Residents of Tangerang (A. Apriyanto, B. Cahya, & I. A. Bunyamin, Trans.). (2026). West Science Nature and Technology, 4(03), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsnt.v4i03.3154