Environmental Monitoring Research 2000–2026 Growth Themes and Collaboration Patterns: A Bibliometric Investigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsnt.v4i01.2734Keywords:
Environmental Monitoring, Bibliometric Analysis, Research Trends, VOSviewerAbstract
This study investigates the evolution, thematic structure, and collaboration patterns of environmental monitoring research from 2000 to 2026 using a bibliometric approach. Data were collected from the Scopus database and analyzed using VOSviewer to examine publication trends, keyword co-occurrence, and collaboration networks among authors and countries. The results indicate a significant increase in research output, particularly after 2015, reflecting growing global concern over environmental degradation, climate change, and sustainability issues. The keyword co-occurrence analysis reveals several dominant research clusters, including pollution and chemical analysis, human health and air quality, ecological and biodiversity studies, and technology-driven monitoring approaches. Emerging themes such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and remote sensing highlight a shift toward digital and data-intensive environmental monitoring systems. The density analysis further confirms that while traditional topics such as pollution and chemistry remain central, newer themes related to smart monitoring and sustainability are gaining momentum. In terms of collaboration, developed countries continue to dominate global research networks, although participation from developing regions is increasing. This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive overview of the intellectual development of environmental monitoring research and identifying future directions that emphasize technological innovation, interdisciplinary integration, and global collaboration.
References
[1] S. Fatimazahra, M. Latifa, S. Laila, and K. Monsif, “Review of hospital effluents: special emphasis on characterization, impact, and treatment of pollutants and antibiotic resistance,” Environ. Monit. Assess., vol. 195, no. 3, p. 393, 2023.
[2] A. Sharan, B. Datta, D. K. Roy, and A. Lal, “Conceptual development and implementation of a digital twin model for managing saltwater intrusion of an island coastal aquifer,” Environ. Monit. Assess., vol. 197, no. 10, pp. 1–25, 2025.
[3] A. J. Audu and A. U. Umana, “Advances in environmental compliance monitoring in the oil and gas industry: Challenges and opportunities,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Updat., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 48–59, 2024.
[4] V. H. Ho, “Sustainable finance & China’s green credit reforms: A test case for bank monitoring of environmental risk,” Cornell Int’l LJ, vol. 51, p. 609, 2018.
[5] J. P. Shimshack, “The economics of environmental monitoring and enforcement,” Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 339–360, 2014.
[6] D. B. Barr, L. C. Wilder, S. P. Caudill, A. J. Gonzalez, L. L. Needham, and J. L. Pirkle, “Urinary creatinine concentrations in the US population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements,” Environ. Health Perspect., vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 192–200, 2005.
[7] D. R. Green, J. J. Hagon, C. Gómez, and B. J. Gregory, “Using low-cost UAVs for environmental monitoring, mapping, and modelling: Examples from the coastal zone,” in Coastal management, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 465–501.
[8] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021.
[9] N. Gorelick, M. Hancher, M. Dixon, S. Ilyushchenko, D. Thau, and R. Moore, “Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 202, pp. 18–27, 2017.
[10] D. W. Kolpin et al., “Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams, 1999− 2000: A national reconnaissance,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1202–1211, 2002.
[11] A. L. Andrady, “Microplastics in the marine environment,” Mar. Pollut. Bull., vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1596–1605, 2011.
[12] S. M. Uppala et al., “The ERA‐40 re‐analysis,” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. A J. Atmos. Sci. Appl. Meteorol. Phys. Oceanogr., vol. 131, no. 612, pp. 2961–3012, 2005.
[13] W. Chen, P. Westerhoff, J. A. Leenheer, and K. Booksh, “Fluorescence excitation− emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 37, no. 24, pp. 5701–5710, 2003.
[14] F.-R. Fan, Z.-Q. Tian, and Z. L. Wang, “Flexible triboelectric generator,” Nano energy, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 328–334, 2012.
[15] N. B. Grimm et al., “Global change and the ecology of cities,” Science (80-. )., vol. 319, no. 5864, pp. 756–760, 2008.
[16] B. J. Cardinale et al., “Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity,” Nature, vol. 486, no. 7401, pp. 59–67, 2012.
[17] J. Yick, B. Mukherjee, and D. Ghosal, “Wireless sensor network survey,” Comput. networks, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 2292–2330, 2008.
[18] J. Valentin, “The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection,” ICRP Publ., vol. 103, pp. 2–4, 2008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Loso Judijanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com