The Effect of System Quality and Information Quality on User Satisfaction with Academic Information Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsist.v4i01.2778Keywords:
System Quality, Information Quality, User Satisfaction, Academic Information Systems, Higher EducationAbstract
This study aims to examine the effect of system quality and information quality on user satisfaction with Academic Information Systems (AIS) in Indonesia. A quantitative approach was employed using survey data collected from 150 respondents who actively use AIS in higher education institutions. Data were gathered through a structured questionnaire measured using a Likert scale. The analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25, including validity and reliability tests, classical assumption tests, and multiple linear regression analysis. The results indicate that both system quality and information quality have a positive and significant effect on user satisfaction, both partially and simultaneously. System quality contributes through aspects such as ease of use, reliability, and responsiveness, while information quality is reflected in accuracy, relevance, and timeliness. Furthermore, information quality was found to have a stronger influence compared to system quality. The coefficient of determination (R²) shows that 48.3% of user satisfaction can be explained by the two independent variables. These findings highlight the importance of improving both system performance and the quality of information provided to enhance user satisfaction. This study provides practical implications for universities and system developers in optimizing academic information systems to better meet user needs and expectations.
References
[1] C. Feger, L. Mermet, B. Vira, P. F. E. Addison, and ..., “Four priorities for new links between conservation science and accounting research,” Conservation …. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 2019.
[2] D. Dang and T. Vartiainen, “Digital strategy patterns in information systems research,” PACIS 2019 Proc. 23rd Pacific Asia …, 2019.
[3] R. W. Scapens and M. Jazayeri, “ERP systems and management accounting change: opportunities or impacts? A research note,” Eur. Account. Rev., 2003, doi: 10.1080/0963818031000087907.
[4] C. Rizza, A. Leotta, and D. Ruggeri, “Accounting Information Systems as Sensemaking Tools in Decision-Making Processes of Small Firms,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Accounting, Financ. Manag. Sci., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 248–262, 2017.
[5] A. F. Borthick, R. L. Clark, and ..., “Making Accounting Information Systems Work: An Empirical Investigation of the Creative Thinking Paradigm.,” … Inf. Syst., 1990.
[6] X. Shi, S. Chen, and X. Lai, “Blockchain adoption or contingent sourcing? Advancing food supply chain resilience in the post-pandemic era,” Front. Eng. Manag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 107–120, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42524-022-0232-2.
[7] A. A. Almulhim and A. A. Aljughaiman, “Corporate Sustainability and Financial Performance: The Moderating Effect of CEO Characteristics,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 16, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151612664.
[8] E. V Neborsky, M. V Boguslavsky, N. S. Ladyzhets, and T. A. Naumova, “Digital transformation of higher education: International trends,” in International Scientific Conference “Digitalization of Education: History, Trends and Prospects”(DETP 2020), Atlantis Press, 2020, pp. 393–398.
[9] J. Efendi, E. V Mulig, and L. M. Smith, “Information technology and systems research published in major accounting academic and professional journals,” … Technol. Account., 2006.
[10] S. I. Ashmarina, E. A. Kandrashina, A. M. Izmailov, and ..., “Gaps in the system of higher education in Russia in terms of digitalization,” Digit. Transform. …, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11367-4_43.
[11] A. Djakona, N. Obushna, B. Iegorov, I. Tkachuk, and ..., “Development of competitive advantages of the national higher education system in the digitalization conditions.” researchgate.net, 2021.
[12] I. Haukijärvi, Strategizing digitalization in a Finnish higher education institution: Towards a thorough strategic transformation. trepo.tuni.fi, 2016.
[13] S. N. Et al., “Educational Administration: Concept, Theory and Management,” Psychol. Educ. J., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1605–1610, 2021, doi: 10.17762/pae.v58i1.953.
[14] I.-H. Su, L. Wu, and K. H. Tan, “The future of the food supply chain: A systematic literature review and research directions towards sustainability, resilience, and technology adoption,” J. Digit. Econ., vol. 2, pp. 303–316, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jdec.2024.03.001.
[15] H. Hardani, P. Medica, F. Husada, H. Andriani, D. J. Sukmana, and U. G. Mada, Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. 2020.
[16] I. Ghozali, “Aplikasi Analisis Multivariative Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 Edisi 9,” Badan Penerbit Univ. Diponegoro, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hildawati Hildawati, Ilham Akbar Bunyamin, Paramita Andiani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









