Global Trends in Digital Entrepreneurship Research Based on Bibliometric Analysis of the Scopus Database from 2013 to 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsjee.v4i01.2686Keywords:
Digital Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship, Digital Technologies, Digital Economy, Bibliometric AnalysisAbstract
The rapid advancement of digital technologies has significantly transformed entrepreneurial activities and business ecosystems worldwide. This study aims to analyze global research trends in digital entrepreneurship through a bibliometric approach using publications indexed in the Scopus database from 2013 to 2023. The study employs bibliometric analysis and network visualization using VOSviewer to examine publication patterns, collaboration networks among authors, institutions, and countries, as well as the thematic structure of the research field. The results show a significant growth in scholarly publications on digital entrepreneurship over the past decade, indicating increasing academic interest in the topic. The collaboration analysis reveals that several countries, particularly the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and the Russian Federation, play central roles in international research networks. In addition, the co-authorship and institutional networks highlight the presence of influential scholars and universities that actively contribute to the development of digital entrepreneurship studies. Keyword co-occurrence analysis identifies major research themes such as entrepreneurship, digital technologies, digital economy, business models, and digital innovation, while emerging topics such as sustainability, startups, and digitalization indicate evolving research directions. The findings demonstrate that digital entrepreneurship has developed into a dynamic and interdisciplinary research area that integrates perspectives from entrepreneurship, information systems, and innovation studies. This study provides a comprehensive mapping of the intellectual structure of digital entrepreneurship research and offers insights into future research opportunities in the evolving digital economy.
References
[1] P. R. Kurnia and R. P. Sitio, “Exploring the Dynamics of Pay Later in E-Commerce: Trust, Security, Satisfaction, and Continuance Intent,” Int. J. Digit. Entrep. Bus., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 58–71, 2023.
[2] N. T. P. Sari and A. Kusumawati, “Literature Review : The Efforts To Strengthening of Micro, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (MSME) in Indonesia,” Asian J. Manag. Entrep. Soc. Sci., vol. 2, no. 01 SE-Articles, pp. 98–115, 2022.
[3] D. Gür Erdoğan, Ö. Canan Güngören, N. B. Hamutoğlu, G. Kaya Uyanık, and T. Demirtas Tolaman, “The relationship between lifelong learning trends, digital literacy levels and usage of web 2.0 tools with social entrepreneurship characteristics,” Croat. J. Educ. Hrvat. časopis za Odgoj i Obraz., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 45–76, 2019.
[4] E. S. C. Berger, F. Von Briel, P. Davidsson, and A. Kuckertz, “Digital or not–The future of entrepreneurship and innovation: Introduction to the special issue,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 125. Elsevier, pp. 436–442, 2021.
[5] S. S. Choirunnisa, F. U. Pudjiastuti, A. Prasetyowati, L. W. Wardana, and F. D. Murwani, “Social Entrepreneurship with Digital Literacy in The Digital Era 4.0 (Systematic Literature Review),” Soc. Sci. Stud., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 168–178, 2024.
[6] P. H. Prayitno, S. Sahid, and M. Hussin, “Social capital and household economic welfare: Do entrepreneurship, financial and digital literacy matter?,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 24, p. 16970, 2022.
[7] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021.
[8] R. Kitchin, “The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism,” GeoJournal, vol. 79, pp. 1–14, 2014.
[9] S. Nambisan, “Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship,” Entrep. theory Pract., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1029–1055, 2017.
[10] S. Nambisan, M. Wright, and M. Feldman, “The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes,” Res. Policy, vol. 48, no. 8, p. 103773, 2019.
[11] A. Rosenblat and L. Stark, “Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers,” Int. J. Commun., vol. 10, p. 27, 2016.
[12] L. Li, F. Su, W. Zhang, and J. Mao, “Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective,” Inf. Syst. J., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1129–1157, 2018.
[13] L. Li, “China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of ‘Made-in-China 2025’ and ‘Industry 4.0,’” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 135, pp. 66–74, 2018.
[14] G. Elia, A. Margherita, and G. Passiante, “Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 150, p. 119791, 2020.
[15] S. Nadkarni and R. Prügl, “Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research,” Manag. Rev. Q., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 233–341, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7.
[16] E. Autio, S. Nambisan, L. D. W. Thomas, and M. Wright, “Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems,” Strateg. Entrep. J., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 72–95, 2018.
[17] J. Cenamor, V. Parida, and J. Wincent, “How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 100, pp. 196–206, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Loso Judijanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










