The Preferences of the Lekuk 50 Tumbi Community in Utilizing Cultural Key Species as Tourism Products

Authors

  • Yoni Elviandri Kerinci Young Lantern Foundation
  • Eliza Sutri Utami Nusantara Technology University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v4i07.2996

Keywords:

Cultural Key Species, Community Preferences, Ecotourism, Conservation, Lekuk 50 Tumbi

Abstract

Key Cultural Species (CSCs) are an important part of the traditional ecological knowledge of indigenous communities, possessing cultural, ecological, and economic value through the development of local wisdom-based tourism. This study aims to analyze the preferences of the Lekuk 50 Tumbi indigenous community, Kerinci Regency, regarding the use of CSCs as a tourism product. The study employed a mixed methods approach with an exploratory design. Data collection was conducted through structured interviews using a Likert-scale questionnaire, in-depth interviews, and field species identification. Respondents were selected using a purposive sampling technique followed by snowball sampling. The results showed that 82.2% of respondents had not yet been involved in the use of CSCs as a tourism product, although 96.7% expressed interest in being involved in its development in the future. The pitcher plant (Nepenthes ampullaria Jack) was the most popular plant species to be developed as a tourism product (56.7%), while the semah fish (Tor douronensis) was the most frequently chosen animal species (68.9%). The most popular form of involvement was the development of souvenirs in the form of processed food products (45.6%), especially by female respondents. Gender, age, and marital status influence the preferred form of community involvement. These findings indicate that communities are highly prepared and interested in participating in Key Cultural Species-based tourism development. Therefore, developing tourism products that integrate conservation, cultural values, and community empowerment has the potential to be an effective strategy for supporting biodiversity conservation while improving the well-being of indigenous communities.

References

[1] D. P. R. R. INDONESIA, “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 1999 Tentang Telekomunikasi,” Lembaran Negara Republik Indones. Tahun, 1999.

[2] K. Koentjaraningrat, “Mentalitas dan pembangunan,” Jakarta: Gramedia, 1985.

[3] M. Marimin, A. Wibisono, and M. A. Darmawan, “Decision support system for natural rubber supply chain management performance measurement: A sustainable balanced scorecard approach,” Int. J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 60–74, 2017.

[4] UNESCO, “Local and indigenous knowledge systems (LINKS),” 2022. https://en.unesco.org/links

[5] N. Pitri, “Kota Sungaipenuh sebagai Kota Sentral Batik Incung,” Hist. J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Sej., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 29–40, 2020.

[6] D. Suswita and A. A. Syamsuardi, “Studi etnobotani dan bentuk upaya pelestarian tumbuhan yang digunakan dalam Upacara Adat Kendurisko di beberapa kecamatan di Kabupaten Kerinci, Jambi,” J. Biol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 67–80, 2013.

[7] R. Lestari, “Kajian Etnobotani Masyarakat Suku Kerinci Di Sekitar Hutan Adat Bukit Tinggai Desa Sungai Deras Kabupaten Kerinci–Provinsi Jambi.[Skripsi],” IPB. Bogor, 2011.

[8] Y. Elviandri, O. A. Yunia, and S. W. Hamzah, “Indigenous environmental perceptions on the use of cultural keystone species for tourism development,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2024, p. 12046.

[9] A. Zahrulianingdyah, “Kuliner sebagai pendukung industri pariwisata berbasis kearifan lokal,” TEKNOBUGA J. Teknol. Busana dan Boga, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018.

[10] S. Nugraha and S. Sumardi, “Destinasi wisata kuliner berbasis makanan tradisional di Kabupaten Toba Samosir,” J. Akad. Pariwisata Medan, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 33–46, 2019.

[11] A. Campione, L. Gurreri, M. Ciofalo, G. Micale, A. Tamburini, and A. Cipollina, “Electrodialysis for water desalination: A critical assessment of recent developments on process fundamentals, models and applications,” Desalination, vol. 434, pp. 121–160, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.12.044.

[12] R. Hudiono, “Pengaruh jenis kelamin dan usia terhadap kecenderungan berwisata selama Pandemi COVID-19,” J. Manaj. Perhotelan Dan Pariwisata, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 123–128, 2022.

[13] Santri, “No Title,” 2009.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

The Preferences of the Lekuk 50 Tumbi Community in Utilizing Cultural Key Species as Tourism Products (Y. Elviandri & E. S. Utami, Trans.). (2026). West Science Social and Humanities Studies , 4(07), 874-879. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v4i07.2996