Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Career Personalization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v4i05.2902Keywords:
Career Personalization, Career Development, Personalized Learning, Employment, Human Resource ManagementAbstract
Career personalization has emerged as an important research area in response to evolving workforce expectations, technological advancements, and the growing demand for individualized career development pathways. This study aims to examine the intellectual structure, research trends, and emerging themes within the field of career personalization through a bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in the Scopus database. Bibliographic data were analyzed using VOSviewer to perform co-occurrence, co-authorship, citation, and collaboration network analyses. The results indicate that research on career personalization has developed into an interdisciplinary field encompassing education, human resource management, employment, professional development, and artificial intelligence. Keyword mapping reveals that employment, personalization, learning systems, and professional aspects are the dominant themes, while recent studies increasingly focus on recommendation systems, predictive analytics, large language models, deep learning, and AI-enhanced career decision support. Collaboration analyses demonstrate growing international partnerships among researchers, institutions, and countries, highlighting the global relevance of the topic. Citation analysis further shows that foundational studies have primarily emphasized educational interest, personalized learning, career development, and work individualization, whereas contemporary research is increasingly driven by intelligent and data-driven approaches. The findings suggest a transition from traditional career management frameworks toward technology-enabled and highly personalized career ecosystems. This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive overview of the evolution of career personalization research and identifying promising directions for future investigations.
References
[1] X. Huang, J. Liu, L. Min, Q. Zeng, J. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “CEO s functional experience and firm performance based on text mining,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 3 March, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281866.
[2] E. Inga, J. Inga, J. Cárdenas, and J. Cárdenas, “Planning and strategic management of higher education considering the vision of latin america,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.3390/EDUCSCI11040188.
[3] J. Oliver, “Determining which CEO candidates will lead growth through innovation,” Strateg. Leadersh., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 27–31, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/SL-03-2023-0030.
[4] K. S. McDonald and L. M. Hite, Career development: A human resource development perspective. Routledge, 2023.
[5] D. A. Ichdan, “The effect of training, work environment, motivation, job satisfaction, and career satisfaction on employee productivity,” Ann. Manag. Organ. Res., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2024.
[6] D. Susita, A. Saptono, J. Susono, and A. Rahim, “The Effect of Career Development and Work Environment on Employee Loyalty with Work Satisfaction as Intervening Variables,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. World, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 20–31, 2020.
[7] C. Van Tran, “What factors shape the intention to use self-service career development planning in Gen Y and Gen Z?” Massey University, 2023.
[8] H. Chen, Y. Wang, and Y. Ding, “Do career demands and career choices always coincide? A matching perspective based on career anchors and job characteristics,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 20, p. 11273, 2021.
[9] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021.
[10] N. Van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010.
[11] J. M. Harackiewicz, J. L. Smith, and S. J. Priniski, “Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education,” Policy insights from Behav. brain Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 220–227, 2016.
[12] H. Sauermann and M. Roach, “Increasing web survey response rates in innovation research: An experimental study of static and dynamic contact design features,” Res. Policy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 273–286, 2013.
[13] M. LaForce et al., “The eight essential elements of inclusive STEM high schools,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 21, 2016.
[14] M. Marras, L. Boratto, G. Ramos, and G. Fenu, “Equality of learning opportunity via individual fairness in personalized recommendations,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 636–684, 2022.
[15] J. Mullen, C. Byun, V. Gadepally, S. Samsi, A. Reuther, and J. Kepner, “Learning by doing, High Performance Computing education in the MOOC era,” J. Parallel Distrib. Comput., vol. 105, pp. 105–115, 2017.
[16] E. Gedrimiene, I. Celik, A. Kaasila, K. Mäkitalo, and H. Muukkonen, “Artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced learning analytics (LA) for supporting career decisions: Advantages and challenges from user perspective,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 297–322, 2024.
[17] A. Naz, H. U. Khan, S. Alesawi, O. I. Abouola, A. Daud, and M. Ramzan, “AI knows you: deep learning model for prediction of extroversion personality trait,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 159152–159175, 2024.
[18] M. Bal and X. D. Lub, “Individualization of work arrangements: A contextualized perspective on the rise and use of i-deals,” in Idiosyncratic deals between employees and organizations, Routledge, 2015, pp. 9–23.
[19] D. Jeske and D. Olson, “Onboarding new hires: recognising mutual learning opportunities,” J. Work. Manag., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 2022.
[20] L. Cen, D. Ruta, and J. Ng, “Big education: Opportunities for big data analytics,” in 2015 IEEE international conference on digital signal processing (DSP), IEEE, 2015, pp. 502–506.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Loso Judijanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









