Collaborative Social Work Practices in Multi-Service Female Juvenile Rehabilitation: A Case Study of ATENSI Implementation in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v4i06.2868Keywords:
Female Juvenile Rehabilitation, Collaborative Social Work, ATENSI, Gender-Responsive Practice, Trauma-Informed Care, Institutional Collaboration, IndonesiaAbstract
This study investigates collaborative social work practices in the context of female juvenile rehabilitation in Indonesia, focusing on the operationalization of the ATENSI (Social Rehabilitation Assistance) framework. Triggered by the increasing vulnerability of adolescent girls, the research explores how integrated, multi-stakeholder, and trauma-informed approaches can enhance institutional care. While ATENSI offers a policy-level shift toward inclusive and holistic service delivery, its implementation in gender-specific settings remains underexplored. Using a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design, the study combines survey data from 75 social workers with qualitative insights from interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations at two major rehabilitation centers. Findings reveal strong internal collaboration, particularly between social workers and psychologists, but limited integration of vocational trainers and external stakeholders, such as NGOs and local governments. Barriers include digital inequities, absence of trauma-informed SOPs, role ambiguity, and sociocultural taboos related to female trauma. The study contributes both empirical and conceptual advancements to global social work discourse. Empirically, it maps gender-responsive collaboration dynamics in a rarely studied Global South context. Conceptually, it introduces the ATENSI Gender-Responsive Collaborative Framework—an integrative model synthesizing collaborative governance, networked social work, and trauma-informed gender-sensitive practice. This research addresses a critical knowledge gap by offering a scalable, context-adaptive model for institutional rehabilitation systems dealing with compounded vulnerabilities in adolescent girls. Its findings are relevant for international audiences seeking to strengthen collaborative practices in gender-responsive care, particularly in resource-constrained settings.
References
[1] Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, “Social Welfare data and program reports,” Ministry of Social Affairs, 2022.
[2] L. Joubert and A. Hocking, “Academic Practitioner Partnerships: A model for collaborative practice research in social work,” Aust. Soc. Work, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 352–363, 2015, doi: 10.1080/0312407x.2015.1045533.
[3] N. Šerić, “The role of collaboration and coordination in social work practice,” Društvene i Humanist. Stud., pp. 445–466, 2021, doi: 10.51558/2490-3647.2021.6.2.445.
[4] L. Petruzzi et al., “Community Health work and social Work Collaboration: integration in health care and public health settings,” J. Ambul. Care Manage., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 187–202, 2024, doi: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000498.
[5] V. Gammons and G. Caswell, “Older people and barriers to self-reporting of chronic pain,” Br. J. Nurs., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 274–278, 2014, doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.5.274.
[6] J. A. Aunger, R. Millar, and J. Greenhalgh, “When trust, confidence, and faith collide: refining a realist theory of how and why inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work,” BMC Health Serv. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, p. 602, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06630-x.
[7] M. Equatora et al., “Motivational interviewing approach in overcoming drug addicts distrust,” J. Pharm. Negat. Results, vol. 13, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.47750/pnr.2022.13.04.034.
[8] E. Rusdiana et al., “College Students’ perception of electronic learning during COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional study,” J. High. Educ. Theory Pract., vol. 22, no. 13, 2022, doi: 10.33423/jhetp.v22i13.5505.
[9] M. Gakh et al., “What works when working together?: Cross-sector collaboration barriers & facilitators of a built environment Health Impact Assessment in Southern Nevada,” Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-being, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 2427885, 2024, doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2427885.
[10] M. Eriksson et al., “The potential of collaborative solutions to improve management of California (United States) wildlands,” Restor. Ecol., vol. 33, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1111/rec.14330.
[11] S. S. Covington and H. Foundation, Women and Addiction: A Gender-responsive Approach. Manual. in The Clinical Innovators Series. Hazelden, 2007.
[12] N. M. Goodrum et al., “Moving toward transdisciplinary approaches to addressing HIV and psychological trauma: Barriers and facilitators to building collaborations,” J. Trauma. Stress, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 884–895, 2023, doi: 10.1002/jts.22959.
[13] R. M. Diamond and M. L. Parker, “Overcoming barriers to collaborative health care: A phenomenological study of medical providers.,” Pract. Innov., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2022, doi: 10.1037/pri0000169.
[14] A. Oyedijo, A. S. F. Koukpaki, S. Kusi-Sarpong, F. Alfarsi, and Y. Yang, “Restraining forces and drivers of supply chain collaboration: evidence from an emerging market,” Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 409–430, 2021, doi: 10.1108/scm-06-2020-0263.
[15] C. Bernard, Intersectionality for social workers. Routledge, 2021. doi: 10.4324/9780429467288.
[16] M. Chesney-Lind and K. Irwin, Beyond Bad girls. 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203940860.
[17] M. Hasanabadi, M. Taebi, and N. M. Alavi, “The Nurses’ Perspectives About Barriers of Nurse-Physician Collaboration in Intensive Care Units: A Q-Methodology study,” Mod. Care J., vol. 20, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.5812/modernc-131741.
[18] J. B. Senecal, K. Metcalfe, K. Wilson, I. Woldie, and L. A. Porter, “Barriers to translational research in Windsor Ontario: a survey of clinical care providers and health researchers,” J. Transl. Med., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 479, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-03097-6.
[19] I. Wakob, S. Schiek, and T. Bertsche, “Overcoming Barriers in Nurse-Pharmacist Collaborations on Wards – Qualitative Expert Interviews with Nurses and Pharmacists,” J. Multidiscip. Healthc., vol. Volume 16, pp. 937–949, 2023, doi: 10.2147/jmdh.s408390.
[20] N. Mamo, J. G. M. Rosmalen, D. J. C. Hanssen, L. M. Tak, and T. C. O. Hartman, “Barriers and potential solutions for collaboration between primary and secondary care in patients with persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders: A nominal group technique study,” Eur. J. Gen. Pract., vol. 30, no. 1, p. 2413090, 2024, doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2413090.
[21] L. Garnweidner-Holme, H. S. Lieberg, H. Irgens-Jensen, and V. H. Telle-Hansen, “Facilitators of and barriers to collaboration between universities and the food industry in nutrition research: a qualitative study,” Food Nutr. Res., vol. 65, 2021, doi: 10.29219/fnr.v65.7874.
[22] J. Manyie, G. J. Gerusu, and R. K. J. Heng, “Collaborative barriers among university - industry - policy (U-I-P) entities on environmental matters: a case study in Sarawak, Malaysia,” Tech. Soc. Sci. J., vol. 12, pp. 316–329, 2020, doi: 10.47577/tssj.v12i1.1702.
[23] K. A. Burch, D. Nafus, K. Legun, and L. Klerkx, “Intellectual property meets transdisciplinary co-design: prioritizing responsiveness in the production of new AgTech through located response-ability,” Agric. Human Values, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 455–474, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10460-022-10378-3.
[24] E. Addy, I. Ayitey, and E. S. Adabor, “Barriers to collaboration among female technical university administrators,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1100–1122, 2024, doi: 10.1108/ijem-11-2022-0481.
[25] C. Rawlinson et al., “An overview of reviews on interprofessional collaboration in Primary Care: Barriers and Facilitators,” Int. J. Integr. Care, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 32, 2021, doi: 10.5334/ijic.5589.
[26] M. Hussein, K. Erjavec, and N. K. Velikonja, “Management Barriers to Inter-Organizational Collaboration in Preoperative Treatment of Patients with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis,” Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 1280, 2023, doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091280.
[27] N. A. Nova and R. A. González, “Evaluating collaboration in a translational research ecosystem,” Systems, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 503, 2023, doi: 10.3390/systems11100503.
[28] S. Jha, A. K. Singh, and R. Chauhan, “Deploying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis to identify and prioritize the barriers faced by early‐career social science researchers during research collaborations,” High. Educ. Q., vol. 78, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.1111/hequ.12542.
[29] K. A. Speed, S. B. Meyer, R. M. Hanning, K. Rideout, M. Kurrein, and S. E. Majowicz, “‘They hold on tight to the healthy eating, we hold on tight to our food safety, and how do we bridge that?’: determinants of successful collaboration between food safety and food security practitioners in British Columbia, Canada,” Can. Food Stud. / La Rev. Can. des études sur l Aliment., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 44–63, 2020, doi: 10.15353/cfs-rcea.v7i1.384.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bambang Rustanto, Tuti Kartika, Ayi Haryani, Dwi Yuliani, Susilawati Susilawati, Nisa Almalia Nurfauziah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









