Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Assessing Patient Protection Under Law No. 17 of 2023 and Article 28H, Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution

Authors

  • Hendri Khuan Philippine Women's University image/svg+xml
  • Ade Suhara Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v4i04.3201

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Patient Protection, Healthcare Law, Constitutional Rights, Legal Accountability

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare presents significant legal challenges concerning patient safety, data protection, and medical accountability. This study examines the adequacy of Indonesia's constitutional and statutory frameworks in protecting patients receiving AI-assisted healthcare services and identifies regulatory measures necessary to strengthen legal certainty. Employing a normative juridical approach, the research analyzes Article 28H(1) of the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning Health, and Law No. 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection through statutory, conceptual, and doctrinal legal analysis. The findings demonstrate that existing regulations provide a substantive foundation for patient rights, informed consent, professional responsibility, and medical data confidentiality. However, significant regulatory limitations remain regarding algorithmic transparency, clinical validation, continuous performance monitoring, human oversight, and the allocation of liability among healthcare professionals, institutions, and technology providers. The study argues that these limitations reflect insufficient operational specificity rather than a complete legal vacuum. Accordingly, it proposes an integrated, risk-based regulatory framework incorporating AI-specific clinical safeguards, transparent decision-making, strengthened data governance, and clearly defined accountability mechanisms. This research contributes to the development of Indonesian healthcare law by demonstrating how existing constitutional guarantees and statutory obligations can be operationalized to ensure patient protection while supporting responsible AI innovation.

References

[1] W. H. O. Guidance, “Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health,” World Heal. Organ., vol. 1, 2021.

[2] C. Cestonaro, A. Delicati, B. Marcante, L. Caenazzo, and P. Tozzo, “Defining medical liability when artificial intelligence is applied on diagnostic algorithms: a systematic review,” Front. Med., vol. 10, p. 1305756, 2023.

[3] M. M. Mello and N. Guha, “Understanding liability risk from using health care artificial intelligence tools,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 390, no. 3. Massachusetts Medical Society, pp. 271–278, 2024.

[4] C. Terranova, C. Cestonaro, L. Fava, and A. Cinquetti, “AI and professional liability assessment in healthcare. A revolution in legal medicine?,” Front. Med., vol. 10, p. 1337335, 2024.

[5] W. H. Organization, Regulatory considerations on artificial intelligence for health. World Health Organization, 2023.

[6] E. Harris, “WHO: What Regulators Should Consider for AI in Health Care.,” JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc., vol. 330, no. 20, p. 1945, 2023.

[7] O. God, “The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia,” vol. 1, no. 1, 2002.

[8] A. H. Situngkir, D. A. Mulyantika, H. Hasibuan, S. N. Saragih, and T. R. Zarzani, “Review of Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning health chapter VI (health service facilities),” Int. J. Synerg. Law, Crim. Justice, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–28, 2024.

[9] N. Republik, “data pribadi,” no. 016999, 2022.

[10] L. J. I. R. Reumy and I. Fitrianita, “Implementasi Hak Atas Kesehatan Sebagai Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan,” J. Wacana Sos. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 18–23, 2026.

[11] K. Badal, C. M. Lee, and L. J. Esserman, “Guiding principles for the responsible development of artificial intelligence tools for healthcare,” Commun. Med., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 47, 2023.

[12] S. Primasatya, “Perlindungan terhadap perkembangan layanan kesehatan berbasis kecerdasan buatan (Artificial Intelligence) di Indonesia,” J. Glob. Huk., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 78–93, 2024.

[13] B. Virando, D. Adyllon, T. Alyansyah, T. Buaton, and T. Suswantoro, “Legal Analysis of the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Medical Services in Indonesia,” KASTA J. Ilmu Sos. Agama, Budaya dan Terap., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1431–1450, 2026.

[14] D. Hermawan and A. Jamaludin, “Legal certainty in the use of artificial intelligence for healthcare and medical diagnosis,” Res. Horiz., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 2845–2854, 2025.

[15] R. Turangan, J. G. Tambun, and T. A. Suswantoro, “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence AI untuk Diagnosis dan Pengobatan Pasien di Rumah Sakit,” JIIP-Jurnal Ilm. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 11565–11570, 2025.

[16] F. Kurniawan and H. Aspan, “A juridical review of informed consent based on Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning health as a replacement for Law Number 36 of 2009,” Bengkoelen Justice J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 85–100, 2024.

[17] A. Alvina, M. Markoni, I. M. Kanthika, and D. P. B. Asri, “Legal Protection of Patients and Responsibilities of Artificial Intelligence-Based Telemedicine Health Services in Indonesia,” Eduvest-Journal Univers. Stud., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 11050–11056, 2025.

[18] S. Sarah and M. Masruroh, “LEGAL ANALYSIS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REGULATION AS A CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM IN INDONESIAN HOSPITALS: CHALLENGES, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND REGULATORY REFORM,” Equal. Int. Law J., pp. 22–29, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.61543/equ.v4i1.170.

[19] A. Hartawati, A. S. Sirajuddin, and M. Sumardin, “Civil legal protection against patients for chatbot-based health consultation malpractice,” Leges Priv., 2025.

[20] M. Sukma, H. Hardin, and S. Sutrisno, “Personal Data Protection in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: A Legal Analysis of the Risks of Data Misuse,” TOFEDU Futur. Educ. J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2606–2611, 2026.

[21] A. G. Putri and D. P. B. Asri, “Legal Protection for Victims of Personal Data Misuse by BPJS Kesehatan Under Law Number 27 of 2022,” J. Cakrawala Huk., vol. 16, no. 3, 2025.

[22] A. Darti and M. Marnija, “The urgency of protecting sensitive data is reflected in Article 4 (2) of Law No. 27/2022 on personal data protection,” J. Equity Law Gov., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 10–21, 2025.

[23] Y. Zahra, “Ensuring data privacy in the age of artificial intelligence,” J. Comput. Sci. Appl. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 37–40, 2025.

[24] R. Shankar, “Navigating Professional Accountability in AI–Assisted Nursing Practice: Ethical and Legal Imperatives for the Digital Age,” Sage Open Nurs., vol. 12, p. 23779608261457720, 2026.

[25] A.-D. Akiaf et al., “Legal Liability in Cases of Medical Error Resulting from Reliance on Artificial Intelligence Systems: A Contemporary Perspective,” Indian J. Inf. Sources Serv., vol. 16, pp. 614–624, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.51983/ijiss-2026.16.2.62.

[26] A. S. Osifowokan, T. O. Agbadamasi, T. K. Adukpo, and N. Mensah, “Regulatory and legal challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the U.S. Healthcare System: Liability, Compliance, and Patient Safety,” World J. Adv. Res. Rev., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 949–955, 2025, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.3.0807.

[27] B. Matesa and I. Masic, “The Liability for Damage Caused by the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medicine,” Med. Arch., vol. 80, no. 1, p. 74, 2026.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

How to Cite

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Assessing Patient Protection Under Law No. 17 of 2023 and Article 28H, Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution (H. Khuan & A. Suhara, Trans.). (2026). West Science Law and Human Rights, 4(04), 406-414. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v4i04.3201