The Application of the Principle of Due Process of Law in Arrests and Detentions Based on Electronic Evidence in Criminal Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v4i03.2773Keywords:
Due Process of Law, Electronic Evidence, Arrest and Detention, Criminal Procedure, Normative Legal AnalysisAbstract
The advancement of digital technology has significantly transformed the nature of criminal activities and the methods used in law enforcement, particularly through the increasing reliance on electronic evidence. This study aims to analyze the application of the principle of due process of law in arrests and detentions based on electronic evidence within criminal proceedings. Using a normative legal research approach, this study examines statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and relevant scholarly literature to evaluate whether current legal frameworks adequately protect individual rights. The results indicate that although electronic evidence has been formally recognized as valid legal evidence, its use as the basis for arrest and detention presents significant challenges. The absence of clear technical and procedural standards, particularly in determining “sufficient preliminary evidence,” may lead to inconsistencies and potential violations of due process. Issues related to authenticity, integrity, chain of custody, and technical validation of electronic evidence further complicate its reliability. Moreover, the complexity of digital evidence creates an imbalance between law enforcement authorities and suspects, limiting the latter’s ability to effectively challenge such evidence. This study concludes that the application of due process of law in cases involving electronic evidence remains inadequate due to gaps in the regulatory framework and limited institutional capacity. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen legal standards, enhance judicial oversight, and develop technical guidelines to ensure that the use of electronic evidence aligns with fundamental principles of justice and human rights. This research contributes to the development of criminal law by providing a normative evaluation of the intersection between technological advancements and procedural safeguards
References
[1] D. Fernando, D. Heniarti, and C. Zakaria, “Transformasi Alat Bukti Elektronik Menggunakan Digital Forensik Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana,” J. Justiciabelen, vol. 5, p. 60, 2025.
[2] A. Khalaf, “Digital forensics and legal guarantees for the accused in an electronic environment,” Al-rafidain Law J., vol. 27, no. 92, pp. 192–216, 2025.
[3] M. Elshobake and A. Sakka, “Legal Implications of Emerging Technologies in Criminal Investigations: Current Challenges and Catalysts for Change,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 12, p. 263, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.5296/ijssr.v12i2.21965.
[4] A. H. Mustafa, “The Future of Criminal Law in the Age of Electronic Crimes and Artificial Intelligence.,” Pakistan J. Life Soc. Sci., vol. 22, no. 2, 2024.
[5] J. O. S. Matthew N. O. Sadiku, Paul A. Adekunte, “Digital Forensics for Law Enforcement,” vol. 9, no. 4, 2025, [Online]. Available: http://www.milwforensics.com/PrivateInvestigatorReviews-computerInvestigationsforPolice
[6] A. Sukmasari, W. Frederik, M. E. Kalalo, and M. H. Soepeno, “Application Of Electronic Evidence as Extension of Legal Civil Evidence Divorce Cases in Indonesia,” Int. J. Law, Environ. Nat. Resour., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2024.
[7] Y. Irianto, “Judicial Adaptation to Digital Evidence in the Era of Cyber Governance,” Formosa J. Sci. Technol., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 3015–3030, 2025.
[8] A. Suryana and M. S. Sakmaf, “Can Electronic Evidence Constitute Sufficient Grounds for Criminal Liability?,” Jihk, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 587–601, 2025.
[9] K. Manurung and B. Harefa, “The Validity of Electronic Evidence and Its Relation to Personal Data Protection,” J. Daulat Huk., vol. 7, p. 455, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.30659/jdh.v7i4.41815.
[10] R. A. E. Calixto, “O devido processo legal,” Rev. Eletrônica da Fac. Direito Fr., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 233–262, 2016.
[11] M. Luisi, “O PRINCÍPIO DO DEVIDO PROCESSO LEGAL,” 2010. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:170362482
[12] M. D. Bayles, “Procedural Due Process,” in Philosophical Dimensions Of The Constitution, Routledge, 2019, pp. 206–221.
[13] E. Sargeant, J. Barkworth, and N. Madon, “Procedural Justice in the Criminal Justice System,” 2020. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.635.
[14] I. C. de Almeida Teles, “O princípio do devido processo legal: breves comentários,” República Fed. do Bras., p. 208, 2021.
[15] A. Safinatunnajah, M. Ali, and P. Teeraphan, “Compliance of the Subjective Terms of Detention in Criminal Procedure with International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” Lex Publica, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 88–101, 2022.
[16] R. Brander and A. Pickup, “Arrest and Detention,” 2009, pp. 157–184. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780199214419.003.0007.
[17] S. P. Indraswari, R. Chan, and A. Lee, “Effectiveness of Pretrial in Testing the Legality of Arrest and Detention,” Rechtsnormen J. Law, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 146–157, 2025.
[18] K. Umam, A. Hadiyanto, and W. H. Sukrisno, “Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Pra Peradilan Mengenai Sah Tidaknya Penetapan Tersangka: Considerations of Pretrial Judges’ Decisions Regarding The Validity of Suspect Determinations,” J. Jurid., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 169–184, 2025.
[19] E. Y. González Kow and E. E. Pozo Cabrera, “La orden de detención con fines investigativos y su incidencia en el debido proceso.,” Reli. Rev. Ciencias Soc. y Humanidades, vol. 9, no. 42, 2024.
[20] V. V Petryk, “The use of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings: issues of collection, verification, and evaluation,” Uzhhorod Natl. Univ. Herald. Ser. Law, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:277426067
[21] H. O. Abdullah, M. Maqsood, and A. Nadeem, “Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Legal Standards, Chain of Custody, and Evidentiary Reliability in The Digital Era,” Res. J. Soc. Aff., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 795–805, 2025.
[22] О. Д. Квашук, “Використання електронних доказів у кримінальному провадженні,” Центральноукраїнський вісник права та публічного управління, no. 2, pp. 50–56, 2025.
[23] M. Jakub, “Certain aspects of criminal evidence and digital evidence,” 2024.
[24] A. Brīvers, “UNDERSTANDING OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE, ITS ACQUISITION AND STRENGTHENING IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS,” in INDIVIDUAL. SOCIETY. STATE. Proceedings of the International Student and Teacher Scientific and Practical Conference, 2021, pp. 156–162.
[25] D. S. R. Dhumillah, “The Stand Of Electronic Evidence In Cyber Crime Law Enforcement In Indonesia,” Eduvest-Journal Univers. Stud., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 7549–7559, 2024.
[26] A. Sidabutar, R. Risdalina, and I. Kumalasari, “Evidence of Criminal Acts in the Field of Electronic Information and Transactions in Review of Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions,” Enrich. J. Multidiscip. Res. Dev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 60–65, 2024.
[27] S. M. Giordano, “Electronic evidence and the law,” Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 161–174, 2004.
[28] C. Gearty, “The Rights to Liberty and Due Process,” Civil Liberties. Oxford University Press, p. 0, Sep. 13, 2007. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780199236169.003.0006.
[29] D. Vizdoaga, “Individual Freedom from the Perspective of Detention and the Principle of Proportionality,” Rev. Institutului Natl. Justitiei, p. 9, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tumian Lian Daya Purba, Silvester Magnus Loogman Palit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com