Public Protection from The Risk of Criminality Based on Artificial Intelligence from a Legal Perspective Modern Crime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v4i01.2546Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, AI-Enabled Crime, Cyber Law, Modern Criminal Law, Public ProtectionAbstract
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) has brought about significant changes in the social, economic, and legal order. Despite the various benefits offered, the use of AI also opens up the possibility of new forms of crime that are increasingly complex, automated, transcend national borders, and difficult to identify. AI-based crimes include automated fraud, identity forgery through deepfake technology, adaptive cyberattacks, misuse of personal data, and transnational cybercrime. These phenomena pose serious threats to public security, national resilience, and public trust in digital governance. Therefore, this study examines crime patterns that utilize AI and analyzes modern criminal law responses to these risks, both in the Indonesian context and internationally. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach to examine criminal law norms, the regulation of cybercrime, and international instruments related to the use of artificial intelligence (AI). The results of the study indicate that modern criminal law still essentially places humans and corporations as the primary subjects of criminal responsibility, while AI is viewed as a means or tool that can be exploited in committing crimes. Therefore, to ensure effective public protection from AI-based crimes, adaptive legal reforms, prevention-oriented law enforcement, strengthening corporate criminal liability, and increased international cooperation are needed.
References
[1] S. J. Russell and P. Norvig, “Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Global Edition 4e,” 2021.
[2] S. Klaus, “The fourth industrial revolution.” Moscow: Ekonomika, 2016.
[3] J. M. Balkin, “Free speech in the algorithmic society: Big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation,” UCDL rev., vol. 51, p. 1149, 2017.
[4] B. Chesney and D. Citron, “Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security,” Calif. L. Rev., vol. 107, p. 1753, 2019.
[5] S. H. Barda Nawawi Arief, Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan kejahatan. Prenada Media, 2018.
[6] Council of Europe, “Council of Europe. Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest Convention, ETS No. 185).”
[7] FCC, “Federal Communications Commission (FCC). FCC forfeiture order. Washington, DC: FCC.,” 2024.
[8] S. W. Brenner, Cybercrime: criminal threats from cyberspace. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2010.
[9] A. G. Ferguson, “The rise of big data policing: Surveillance, race, and the future of law enforcement,” in The rise of big data policing, New York University Press, 2017.
[10] S. Rahardjo, “Legal Science, Bandung.” Alumni, 2012.
[11] ENISA, “European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). Artificial intelligence cybersecurity challenges: Threat landscape for artificial intelligence. ENISA.”
[12] G. Hallevy, Liability for crimes involving artificial intelligence systems, vol. 257. Springer, 2015.
[13] H. T. Muladi, “Prinsip Pengaturan dalam Kriminalisasi dalam Buku Demokratisasi,” Hak Asasi Mns. dan Reformasi Huk. di Indones. Habibie Center, Jakarta, 2002.
[14] B. OECD, “Recommendation of the council on artificial intelligence,” Organ. Econ. Coop. Dev., 2019.
[15] F. Pasquale, The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press, 2015.
[16] United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, “Emerging threats: The intersection of criminal and technological innovation in the use of automation and artificial intelligence in the cybercrime landscape of Southeast Asia. Cybercrime Technical Policy Brief,” UNODC, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Angelorum Boekan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













