Bibliometric Analysis of Environmental Law Research: Identification of Thematic Focuses and Global Collaboration Networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v3i04.2314Keywords:
Environmental Law, Bibliometric Analysis, Climate Change, Sustainable Development, Legal Governance, International Collaboration, Environmental LegislationAbstract
This study does a thorough bibliometric analysis of environmental legal research to ascertain its topic foci, intellectual framework, and global collaboration networks. The study utilizes data from Scopus and Web of Science, employing VOSviewer and Bibliometrix tools to examine publication patterns, keyword co-occurrences, and collaborations among institutions and countries from 2000 to 2025. The findings indicate three primary topic clusters: (1) environmental law and governance, (2) regulation and enforcement, and (3) climate change and sustainable development. The United States, China, and the Netherlands are the primary influential donors, while burgeoning collaborations from Asia and Latin America signify an increasing diversification of worldwide research involvement. Author and institutional networks, including prominent individuals like Heyvaert, Sands, and Peel, exemplify the international and interdisciplinary characteristics of the area. The study highlights the evolution of environmental law into a worldwide and integrated field, integrating legal theory, policy, and sustainable practices. It provides strategic ideas for enhancing collaboration, capacity development, and evidence-based policymaking in environmental governance.
References
[1] N. O. D. Ellili, “Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and sustainability,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 8183–8209, 2024.
[2] X. Zhao, D. Nan, C. Chen, S. Zhang, S. Che, and J. H. Kim, “Bibliometric study on environmental, social, and governance research using CiteSpace,” Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 10, p. 1087493, 2023.
[3] A. L. Franks, E. J. Simoes, R. Singh, and B. S. Gray, “Assessing prevention research impact: a bibliometric analysis,” Am. J. Prev. Med., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 211–216, 2006.
[4] M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” J. Informetr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017.
[5] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021.
[6] N. Van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010.
[7] M. Krämer et al., “A Microphysics guide to cirrus–Part II: climatologies of clouds and humidity from observations,” Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., vol. 2020, pp. 1–63, 2020.
[8] L. Napolitano et al., “Hypogonadism in patients with Prader Willi syndrome: a narrative review,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 22, no. 4, p. 1993, 2021.
[9] N. Gunningham and C. Holley, “Next-generation environmental regulation: law, regulation, and governance,” Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 273–293, 2016.
[10] J. R. Boyd, A discourse on winning and losing, vol. 400. Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, AL, 2018.
[11] D. Bodansky, “The Paris climate change agreement: a new hope?,” Am. J. Int. Law, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 288–319, 2016.
[12] S. Voigt, Institutional economics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
[13] B. J. Richardson, “From fiduciary duties to fiduciary relationships for socially responsible investing: responding to the will of beneficiaries,” J. Sustain. Financ. Invest., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–19, 2011.
[14] D. R. Boyd, “The environmental rights revolution: a global study of constitutions, human rights, and the environment,” in The Environmental Rights Revolution, University of British Columbia Press, 2011.
[15] J. Peel and H. M. Osofsky, “Climate change litigation,” Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 21–38, 2020.
[16] P. S. Qc, “Principles of international environmental law,” 1995, Cambridge University Press.
[17] R. K. Morgan, “Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art,” Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 5–14, 2012.
[18] R. J. Lazarus, “Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future,” Cornell L. Rev., vol. 94, p. 1153, 2008.
[19] G. Kassinis and N. Vafeas, “Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 399–415, 2002.
[20] J. M. Karpoff, J. Lott John R, and E. W. Wehrly, “The reputational penalties for environmental violations: Empirical evidence,” J. Law Econ., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 653–675, 2005.
[21] S. Ganeriwal, L. K. Balzano, and M. B. Srivastava, “Reputation-based framework for high integrity sensor networks,” ACM Trans. Sens. Networks, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–37, 2008.
[22] P. L. Dhepe and A. Fukuoka, “Cellulose conversion under heterogeneous catalysis,” ChemSusChem Chem. Sustain. Energy Mater., vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 969–975, 2008.
[23] L. J. Kotzé, Global environmental governance: Law and regulation for the 21st century. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012.
[24] C. Voigt, “The Paris Agreement: What is the standard of conduct for parties?,” QIL, Zoom-in, vol. 26, pp. 17–28, 2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Loso Judijanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com