Discretionary Authority in Government Administration after Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v3i03.2062Keywords:
Discretionary Authority, Government Administration, Law Number 30 of 2014, Administrative Law, Normative Legal AnalysisAbstract
This study examines the regulation and implementation of discretionary authority in Indonesian government administration following the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. Using a normative juridical approach, the research analyzes the legal framework, guiding principles, and mechanisms of accountability associated with the use of discretion by public officials. The law formally defines discretionary authority, outlines conditions for its application, and incorporates safeguards to ensure decisions align with legal norms and serve the public interest. The findings indicate that while the law improves legal certainty and promotes good governance, practical challenges remain in its application, including limited legal awareness among officials, fear of legal repercussions, and weak oversight mechanisms. The study concludes that strengthening institutional capacity and providing legal guidance are essential to ensure the responsible and effective use of discretion in public administration.
References
[1] K. F. Warren, “Administrative discretion,” Encycl. public Adm. public policy, pp. 35–38, 2003.
[2] S. Kunarti, “Discretion as Freedom of Action in Administering Governance,” in SHS Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 2018, p. 3018.
[3] K. I. V. N. Fernandes, “A discricionariedade administrativa face ao princípio da boa administração,” 2015, Universidade do Porto (Portugal).
[4] 程雷, “大数据侦查的法律控制,” 中国社会科学, vol. 11, pp. 156–180, 2018.
[5] F. Yang, X. Huang, and Z. Li, “Gender, situational visibility, and discretionary decision-making of regulatory street-level bureaucrats under pandemic emergency: An experimental study in China,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1312–1329, 2022.
[6] M. I. A. Endang, “Diskresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pemerintahan Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan/Discretion and Responsbility of Government Officials Based on Law of State Administration,” J. Huk. Peratun, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 223–244, 2018.
[7] H. P. Putra, “New Paradigm Of Abuse Of Power On Discretion After Government Administration Act,” Unram Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, 2018.
[8] D. Heryansyah, “Problematika Diskresi dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia (Studi terhadap Undang-undang No. 30 Tahon 2014),” J. Yuridis, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 239–252, 2015.
[9] F. Muin, “Diskresi Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan,” Tanjungpura Law J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 151–165, 2018.
[10] D. Cahyandari, A. Siboy, M. Fadli, R. Wulandari, and P. Y. Saputra, “Position of Principle of Propriety in the Use of Discretion in Government Actions,” JL Pol’y Glob., vol. 80, p. 28, 2018.
[11] P. D. P. P. O. PTUN, “Ahkam”.
[12] A. Salsabila, “Expansion of the discretion concept reviewed from legal anti-positivism,” J. Ilm. Kebijak. Huk., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 479–494, 2022.
[13] S. I. Aritonang and A. Erliyana, “Discretionary Authority of Government Officials After Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation in the Perspective of Government Administration:(Case Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020): Kewenangan Diskresi Pejabat Pemerintah Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Dalam Perspektif Administrasi Pemerintahan: Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020,” Santhet (Jurnal Sej. Pendidik. Dan Humaniora), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 170–180, 2023.
[14] J. Heath, The machinery of government: Public administration and the liberal state. Oxford University Press, 2020.
[15] S. Li et al., “Alternating modified CAPOX/CAPIRI plus bevacizumab in untreated unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial,” Signal Transduct. Target. Ther., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 346, 2024.
[16] V. I. W. Nalle, “The Scope of Discretion in Government Administration Law: Constitutional or Unconstitutional?,” Hasanuddin Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2018.
[17] S. S. Maryanne, S. Satoto, and F. Akbar, “Legal Paradigm of The Discretion By Regionl heads in the management of Public Service,” Ultim. J. Leg. Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 110–118, 2024.
[18] O. Sherstoboev, “The Treatment of Invalid Administrative Acts between Safeguard of Public Interest and Protection of Individual Rights,” Annu. Comp. Adm. Law Rev. 2021/ed. Oleg N. Sherstoboev, Konstantin V. Davydov, Alessandro Cenerelli. Novosib. NSUEM, 2022.
[19] A. B. Susilo, “Makna dan kriteria diskresi Keputusan dan/atau tindakan pejabat publik dalam mewujudkan tata pemerintahan yang baik,” J. Huk. dan Peradil., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 133–152, 2015.
[20] A. N. Ismail and T. Syahuri, “Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik Sebagai Dasar Pejabat Pemerintah Untuk Melakukan Diskresi,” Depos. J. Publ. Ilmu Huk., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 165–178, 2024.
[21] J. Mustamu, “Diskresi dan tanggungjawab administrasi pemerintahan,” Sasi, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2011.
[22] I. Paradizsa and B. Susanto, “IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAH: KERANGKA KELEMBAGAAN UNTUK PENERAPAN PUTUSAN PERSIDANGAN,” J. Adm. Negara, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 235–253, 2023.
[23] M. T. Cooper and M. J. Coughlin, “Subcapital oblique osteotomy for correction of bunionette deformity: medium-term results,” Foot Ankle Int., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1376–1380, 2013.
[24] E. A. M. Putra, G. D. H. Wibowo, and M. Minollah, “Legal Vacuum in Indonesian Administrative Law: Urgency of Policy Regulation,” Indones. J. Law Econ. Rev., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 10–21070, 2024.
[25] E. A. Radzhabova, “Principles Governing the Exercise of Discretionary Powers by Public Authorities: Systematic Structure and Constitutional-Legal Foundation,” Russ. J. Leg. Stud., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 15–24, 2024.
[26] N. Ishak, “Implementation and Supervision of Official Discretion in Local Government of Republic of Indonesia,” J. Al Daulah J. Huk. Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan, vol. 8, no. 2, 2019.
[27] F. R. Risadde, A. E. Widiarto, and I. D. Qurbani, “Connectivity of Discretionary Status in State Administrative Court Lawsuit: Implications After Law Number 6 of 2023 on Amendments to the Job Creation PERPPU,” J. Soc. Policy Issues, pp. 148–153, 2024.
[28] U. Saritomo, “Juridical Analysis of Legal Protection On Charges Due To Discretionary Authority For Regional Officials.,” J. Res. Soc. Sci. Econ. Manag., vol. 3, no. 12, 2024.
[29] D. J. Galligan, Discretionary powers: A legal study of official discretion. Oxford University Press, 1990.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Loso Judijanto, Hildawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com