Formulation of Notary's Right of Refusal In Criminal Case Examination Process

Authors

  • I Nengah Nuarta Bali International University
  • Mochamad Sukedi Bali International University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v3i03.2060

Keywords:

Right of Recusal, Notary, Law Enforcement

Abstract

The notary is frequently a party to a dispute that occurs between the parties to the deed.  For the parties, the notary drafts an official deed.   Because of this requirement, the notary must have legal protection in the form of the right of renunciation.   Law Number 30 of 2004 about the Notary Position (UUJN) and Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Notary Position (UUJN-P) (norm vacuum) do not, however, restrict the right of renunciation for notaries.  This study employed normative legal research as its methodology.  The findings of this dissertation research serve as the philosophical foundation for allowing a notary to decline to perform his duties in relation to notarial deed making as a public official, namely offering protection and assurances for the attainment of legal certainty.  Adding guidelines for the legal protection of notaries in the UUJN is one way to standardize the notary's power of refusal in the course of law enforcement over notarial deeds pertaining to legal matters. Researchers provide a proposal with the formulation of norms that are made into additional paragraph (5) in Article 66 of the UUJN. According to the established norms, notaries who follow the law and ethical codes are protected from both civil and criminal prosecution while carrying out their official duties.

References

AB. Syah. (1986). Methodology of Science.

Jakarta: YOI.

Abdul Ghofur Anshori. (2009). Indonesian Kenotariatan Institutions, Legal and Ethical Perspectives. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Amiruddin and Zainal Asikin. (2013). Legal Research Methods. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Bagus Gede Ardi Artha Prabawa (2017). Juridical Analysis of the Right of Ingkar Notary in the Event of Examination According to the Notary Position Law and the Notary Code of Ethics. Journal of Acta Comitas Vol. 2, No. 01, April 2017, Udayana University Master of Kenotariatan Study Program.

C.S.T. Kansil. (2003). Principles of Legal Professional Ethics. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

E. Y. Kanter. (2001). Legal Professional Ethics A Socio-Religious Approach. Jakarta: Storia Grafika.

G.H.S. Lumban Tobing. (1999). Regulation of the Office of Notary, Cet. 3. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Habib Adjie. (2017). Civil and Administrative Sanctions Against Notaries as Public Officials. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Herlien Budiono. (2017). Notary According to Common Law and Civil Law and Related Regulations in the Framework of Fulfillment of Ease of Doing Business in Indonesia, Paper on Fulfillment of Ease of Doing Business: Opportunity, Challenge And Role Of Notary And Other Legal Professions In The Implementation, Bali.

I Nyoman Putu Budiartha. (2016). Outsourcing Law. Malang: Setara Press.

M.J.A. van Mourik. (1992). Civil Law and the Civil Law Notary in the Modern World, Paper at the Scientific Discussion "The Effect of Globalization on Common Law and Civil Law (specifically BW)", Jakarta.

Marwan Effendy. (2004). Legal Theory, and Perspectives on Policy, Comparison, and Legal Harmonization. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press Group.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Formulation of Notary’s Right of Refusal In Criminal Case Examination Process (I. N. Nuarta & M. . Sukedi , Trans.). (2025). West Science Law and Human Rights, 3(03), 274-280. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v3i03.2060