Digital Education and the Challenge of Personal Data Protection: An International Human Rights Law Perspective on State Obligations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v3i03.2017Keywords:
Person Data Protection, Human Rights, Digital Education, Due Diligence, State ObligationsAbstract
There is currently a conflict between technological innovation and the preservation of privacy rights as a result of the increasing collection of students’ personal data caused by the digital transformation of education. Through the lens of international human rights law, this research seeks to understand states’ obligations to protect personal data in the context of digital education. This research examines three theoretical frameworks: the concept of International Due Dilligence, the interpretation of General Comment No. 16 of the UN Human Rights Committee, and Human Rights Protection Theory, using a normative legal methodology and doctrinal approach. The findings demonstrate significant weaknesses in traditional regulatory frameworks that prevent education data protection from incorporating a human rights perspective. In the context of digital education, this research shows that the state has three duties to uphold, defend and fulfill the right to data privacy. To assess the state’s compliance with its duties to prevent, address and remedy education data privacy violations, this research creates an evaluative model based on due diligence. The results are important for creating a human rights-based approach to regulating education data, providing a conceptual framework that strikes a balance between protecting fundamental rights and technological advancement, and increasing state accountability in digital education data governance.
References
[1] Acharya, B. (2020). Digital Education and Data Privacy: Developing Countries' Perspective. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 25(3), 112-128.
[2] Brandtzaeg, P. B., Pultier, A., & Moen, G. M. (2021). Children's privacy and connectedness in the age of educational technology. Journal of Children and Media, 15(2), 249-266.
[3] Dalla Corte, L. (2023). A right to digital identity: The European approach to online education data protection. European Journal of Law and Technology, 14(1), 1-22.
[4] De Hert, P., & Papakonstantinou, V. (2021). The new General Data Protection Regulation: Still a sound system for the protection of individuals? Computer Law & Security Review, 32(2), 179-194.
[5] Floridi, L. (2022). The ethics of information transparency. Ethics and Information Technology, 17(2), 89-105.
[6] Gasser, U., & Cortesi, S. (2021). Children's rights and digital technologies: Introduction to the discourse and some meta-observations. Human Rights of Children in the Digital Era, 3-30.
[7] Henly, M., & Shabani, M. (2022). Privacy in digital education ecosystems: Standards and governance frameworks. Computer Law & Security Review, 45, 105687.
[8] Hoofnagle, C. J., van der Sloot, B., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2023). The European Union General Data Protection Regulation: What it is and what it means. Information & Communications Technology Law, 28(1), 65-98.
[9] Kemp, K. (2020). Big Data, Human Rights and the Ethics of Scientific Research. Human Rights in the Age of Big Data, 1-19.
[10] Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017). Children and young people's rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. New Media & Society, 19(5), 657-670.
[11] Mendez, F., & Mendez, M. (2020). Due diligence in international law: Its application to human rights violations in the age of artificial intelligence. Stanford Journal of International Law, 56(1), 1-35.
[12] Moerel, L., & Prins, C. (2021). On the death of purpose limitation. Privacy Law Scholars Conference, 2-30.
[13] Naudé, W., & Dimitri, N. (2022). The race for an artificial general intelligence: Implications for public policy. AI & Society, 35, 367-379.
[14] Nissenbaum, H. (2020). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press.
[15] OECD. (2023). Digital Education Framework: Implementation Challenges and Policy Recommendations. OECD Publishing.
[16] O'Flaherty, M. (2022). The United Nations Human Rights Committee: Global standard-setting for freedom of expression. Human Rights Law Review, 21(3), 249-275.
[17] Polonetsky, J., & Jerome, J. (2018). Student data: Trust, transparency, and the role of consent. Education Privacy Resource Center, 1-29.
[18] Rubel, A., & Jones, K. M. L. (2021). Student privacy in learning analytics: An information ethics perspective. The Information Society, 32(2), 143-159.
[19] UNESCO. (2022). Digital Education Futures: Learning Transformation Through Education 4.0. UNESCO Publishing.
[20] United Nations. (2021). General Comment No. 25 on Children's Rights in Relation to the Digital Environment. Committee on the Rights of the Child.
[21] van der Hof, S. (2019). I agree... or do I? A rights-based analysis of the law on children's consent in the digital world. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 34(2), 409-445.
[22] Williamson, B. (2019). Digital data in education: A framework for critical analysis. Learning, Education, & Technology: The Issue of Digital Equity, 1-28.
[23] World Bank. (2021).Digital Technologies in Education: Promise and Pitfalls. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
[24] Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J., & Hart, P. (2011).Information privacy concerns: Linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 798–824.
[25] Zuboff, S. (2019).The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vania Sokya Fausta, Rina Arum Prastyanti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













