Inequality in Person Data Protection for Vulnerable Communitiesin the Digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v3i03.1972Keywords:
Digital Exclusion, Vulnerable Communities, Personal Data Regulation gap, Critical Digital Literacy, Legal Protection of Data in Developing CountriesAbstract
This study aims to analyze the inequality of personal data protection for vulnerable groups in Indonesia in the context of digital transformation. The scope includes communities with low digital literacy, remote areas, the elderly, and informal sector workers. The methods used are literature study, policy analysis, survey analysis, and case studies. Data were taken from 94 cases of personal data leaks from 2019–2023, with the majority coming from private electronic system organizers. The findings show that data protection tends to be a luxury item that is only enjoyed by empowered groups. According to the data, there were 35 cases of leaks in 2023 alone. This study also proposes a social justice-based governance model to address structural inequality for vulnerable groups.
References
Journal
[1] L. Judijanto, N. Solapari, and I. Putra, “An Analysis of the Gap Between Data Protection Regulations and Privacy Rights Implementation in Indonesia,” vol. 3, no. 01, pp. 20–29, 2024, doi: 10.58812/eslhr.v3i01.
[2] C. H. I. H. Arris, I. H. Arvard, L. A. W. R. Eview, D. W. Carbado, and C. I. Harris, “APPINPublic Law & Legal Theory Research Paper No . 19-52 I NTERSECTIONALITY AT 30 : M G THE M ARGINS OF A NTI -E SSENTIALISM , I NTERSECTIONALITY , AND D OMINANCE T HEORY A ND ESSAY INTERSECTIONALITY AT 30 : MAPPING THE MARGINS,” vol. 2193, no. 19, 2019.
[3] A. S. Kriswandaru et al., “Efektivitas Kebijakan Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia: Analisis Hukum Perdata dengan Pendekatan Studi Kasus,” vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 740–755, 2024, doi: 10.51903/hakim.v2i04.2157.
[4] L. Effendi, R. S. Darwis, and N. C. Apsari, “DAN KEBUTUHANNYA (Sebuah Kajian Hasil Pemetaan Sosial CSR PT Indonesia Power UPJP Kamojang)KELOMPOK RENTAN,” Share Soc. Work J., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 51, 2020, doi: 10.24198/share.v10i1.26896.
[5] J. A. G. M. Van Dijk, “Digital Divide: Impact of Access,” Int. Encycl. Media Eff., pp. 1–11, 2017, doi: 10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0043.
[6] M. Madden, M. Gilman, K. Levy, and A. Marwick, “Prcy, Poverty and Big Data: A Matrix of Vivaulnerabilities for Poor Americans,” Wash. Univ. Law Q., vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 053–125, 2017.
[7] R. Natamiharja and I. Setiawan, “Guarding Privacy in the Digital Age: A Comparative Analysis of Data Protection Strategies in Indonesia and France,” Jambe Law J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 233–251, 2024, doi: 10.22437/home.v7i1.349.
[8] D. Pöhn, N. Mörsdorf, and W. Hommel, “Needle in the Haystack: Analyzing the Right of Access According to GDPR Article 15 Five Years after the Implementation,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., 2023, doi: 10.1145/3600160.3605064.
[9] S. S. Lima Filho and B. C. S. Peixe, “Análise de eficiência na gestão de recursos das Instituições Federais de Ensino Superior à luz da nova administração pública,” Rev. Contemp. Contab., vol. 17, no. 43, pp. 88–103, 2020, doi: 10.5007/2175-8069.2020v17n43p88.
[10] T. Bolca, “Can PIPEDA ‘Face’ the Challenge? An Analysis of the Adequacy of Canada’s Private Sector Privacy Legislation against Facial Recognition Technology,” Can. J. Law Technol., vol. 18, no. 1, 2020, [Online]. Available: www.zdnet.com/article/
[11] A. Issaoui, J. Örtensjö, and M. S. Islam, “Exploring the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliance in cloud services: insights from Swedish public organizations on privacy compliance,” Futur. Bus. J., vol. 9, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s43093-023-00285-2.
[12] R. Rughiniș, C. Rughiniș, S. N. Vulpe, and D. Rosner, “From social netizens to data citizens: Variations of GDPR awareness in 28 European countries,” Comput. Law Secur. Rev., vol. 42, pp. 36–46, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105585.
[13] L. A. Sihombing and Y. Nuraeni, “Norms and Ethics in Criminal Justice: Assessing Contemporary Legal Policy,” J. Info Sains Inform. …, vol. 13, no. 03, pp. 1088–1099, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/InfoSains/article/view/3693%0Ahttps://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/InfoSains/article/download/3693/2885
[14] D. J. Solove, “Murky Consent: an Approach To the Fictions of Consent in Privacy Law,” Bost. Univ. Law Rev., vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 593–639, 2024, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4333743.
[15] M. J. Amiradakis, “Surveillance capitalism and the derision of the digital denizen,” Acta Acad., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 52–75, 2020, doi: 10.18820/24150479/aa52i2/4.
[16] G. A. Pimenta Rodrigues et al., “Understanding Data Breach from a Global Perspective: Incident Visualization and Data Protection Law Review,” Data, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–24, 2024, doi: 10.3390/data9020027.
[17] T. N. Suciati, “Sinisme Privasi, Diskriminasi Dan Komoditas Data: Paradoks Media Sosial Di Era Kapitalisme Pengawasan,” J. Acta Diurna, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 145, 2019, doi: 10.20884/1.actadiurna.2019.15.2.2138.
[18] V. Papakonstantinou and P. De Hert, “The Regulation of Digital Technologies in the EU,” Regul. Digit. Technol. EU, no. May, 2024, doi: 10.4324/9781032630175.
News Article:
- AwanApps Team. (2024, November 1). Indonesia Wajib Contoh! Berikut 8 Negara dengan
- ITS Media Center. (2024, November 1). Grafik kasus kebocoran data di Indonesia. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember. https://www.its.ac.id/news/2024/11/06/gelar-idsecconf-its-ajak-publik-sadar-keamanan-data-di-era-ai/
- Perlindungan Data Terbaik. AwanApps. https://www.awanapps.com/technologies/indonesia-wajib-contoh-berikut-8-negara-dengan-perlindungan-data-terbaik/
- Pew Research Center, survei terhadap orang dewasa di AS yang dilakukan pada 15–21 Mei 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/10/18/how-americans-view-data-privacy/
- Santosa, L. W. (2023). Kominfo tangani 94 kasus kebocoran data pribadi sejak 2019, 62 kasus melibatkan PSE privat. ANTARA News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3584103/kominfo-tangani-94-kasus-kebocoran-data-pribadi-dalam-tiga-tahun
- Surfshark. (2024). 10 Negara dengan Kebocoran Data Terbesar (Januari 2020–Januari 2024). Diakses dari Databoks by Katadata
- Pew Research Center, survei terhadap orang dewasa di AS yang dilakukan pada 15–21 Mei 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/10/18/how-americans-view-data-privacy/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Firman Nur Arifin, Rina Arum Prastyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com