Juridical Analysis of the Bankruptcy of PT Sritex Based on Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v3i02.1828Keywords:
Bankruptcy Law, PT Sritex, Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU)Abstract
This study examines the bankruptcy of PT Sri Rejeki Isman Tbk (PT Sritex) within the framework of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (UU Kepailitan). Employing a normative juridical approach, it analyzes the legal provisions, procedural implementation, and implications of the case. The findings reveal compliance with the statutory criteria for bankruptcy but also expose significant procedural inefficiencies, particularly in asset valuation and the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) process. The study highlights the need for reforms to streamline court procedures, enhance transparency, and strengthen corporate governance practices. These measures are crucial for improving the effectiveness and equity of Indonesia’s bankruptcy system while safeguarding the rights of creditors and debtors.
References
[1] K. Yitawati, A. Sulistiyono, and P. Pujiyono, “Reconstructing the Debt Restructuring Mechanism in the Indonesian Law on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations,” NeuroQuantology, vol. 20, no. 19, pp. 346–359, 2022.
[2] E. Fahamsyah, V. Taniady, R. D. Saputra, K. V. Rachim, and G. Wijaya, “The Problem of Filing for Bankruptcy in Indonesian Law: Should the Insolvency Test Mechanism Be Applied?,” Volksgeist J. Ilmu Hukurn Dan Konstitusi, vol. 7, no. 1, 2024.
[3] Y. A. Kenting and H. D. Parulian, “Kedudukan kreditor separatis terhadap rencana perdamaian dalam proses penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang,” J. Ilmu Huk. Aleth., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 91–110, 2022.
[4] M. Yolanda, R. Rismansyah, and T. Sudiyanto, “PENGARUH RASIO PROFITABILITAS, LIKUIDITAS, DAN LEVERAGE TERHADAP FINANCIAL DISTRESS PADA PERUSAHAAN SUB INDUSTRI TEKSTIL YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA,” J. Manag. Small Mediu. Enterp., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1103–1112, 2024.
[5] L. Hartati, A. K. Apollo, and I. Siswanti, “Analysis of Factors That Influence Company Value in Textile and Garment Companies,” 2023.
[6] R. Utami, H. Siregar, and F. Syarifuddin, “The analysis of bankruptcy prediction model with adjustment of earning management on textile and garment sub-sector in Indonesia Stock Exchange,” Int. J. Res. Rev., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 208–218, 2020.
[7] B. R. Sopakuwa, B. Gomulia, and A. Faisal, “Faktor yang mempengaruhi likuiditas perusahaan tekstil dan garmen di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) periode 2019–2021,” Fair Value J. Ilm. Akunt. Dan Keuang., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1618–1631, 2022.
[8] M. Riantini et al., “Livelihood vulnerability household fishermen household due to climate change in Lampung Province, Indonesia,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 12, p. e0315051, 2024.
[9] M. Jazuri and Y. Z. A. Dahlan, “Pelaksanaan Fungsi Pengadilan Niaga dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan (Suatu Analisis di Pengadilan Niaga Medan),” J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 3, 2013.
[10] S. Vimala, “Assessing corporate financial distress: conceptual framework of Altman’s z-score model,” Acad. An Int. Multidiscip. Res. J., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 52–59, 2014.
[11] M. Awais, F. Hayat, N. Mehar, and W. Ul-Hassan, “Do z-score and current ratio have ability to predict bankruptcy,” Dev. Ctry. Stud., vol. 5, no. 13, pp. 30–36, 2015.
[12] A. C. I. Kakauhe and W. Pontoh, “Analisis model altman (z-score) dalam mengukur kinerja keuangan untuk memprediksi kebangkrutan pada perusahaan manufaktur sektor industri barang konsumsi di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Bei) Periode 2010-2014,” Accountability, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2017.
[13] M. Ivaniš and L. Ožegović, “ALTMAN’S Z-SCORE MODEL OF ANALYSIS,” INOVAEDUCATION 2017, p. 189, 2013.
[14] R. P. P. Fai, H. R. Kamila, and F. G. Irwandi, “The Role of the Altman Z-Score Method in Predicting Corporate Bankruptcy,” INCOME Innov. Econ. Manag., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2023.
[15] R. L. Gaol, “The Authority of the Commercial Court in Bankruptcy Disputes,” Pena Justisia Media Komun. dan Kaji. Huk., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 304–313, 2023.
[16] R. N. Kasdi and S. Margono, “Analisis putusan pengadilan niaga terkait akibat hukum permohonan PKPU yang diajukan oleh pihak yang tidak berwenang (studi kasus putusan Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat nomor 24/Pdt. Sus-PKPU/2018/PN. Niaga. Jkt. Pst),” J. Huk. Adigama, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1399–1423, 2019.
[17] S. Makmur, “Kepastian hukum kepailitan bagi kreditur dan debitur pada pengadilan niaga Indonesia,” Mizan J. Islam. Law, vol. 4, no. 2, 2018.
[18] A. Kiemas, J. Matheus, and A. Gunadi, “Redefining Bankruptcy Law: Incorporating the Principle of Business Continuity for Fair Debt Resolution,” Rechtsidee, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 10–21070, 2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Firmansyah Firmansyah, Silvester Magnus Loogman Palit, William Hendrik Reba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com