Issues of Disagreement and the Treasury of Islamic Knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsiss.v3i03.1944Keywords:
Khilafiyah, Differences of Opinion, Islamic Intellectual Tradition, Contextual Ijtihad, Religious ModerationAbstract
Khilafiyah, or differences of opinion in Islam, is an inherent phenomenon in the history of Islamic thought. This study aims to explore the dynamics of khilafiyah and its contributions to enriching the Islamic intellectual tradition. Using a qualitative approach based on literature review, this research examines classical and contemporary sources to identify the causes of differences of opinion, the methodological frameworks of scholars, and the relevance of khilafiyah in addressing modern issues. Findings indicate that khilafiyah not only broadens the intellectual horizons of Muslims but also serves as a crucial foundation for the development of disciplines such as fiqh, usul fiqh, hadith studies, and theology. Amidst the challenges of globalization and pluralism, khilafiyah remains relevant as an adaptive and solution-oriented tool for contextual ijtihad. However, critical awareness is needed to prevent polarization of the ummah due to the misuse of differences. Thus, khilafiyah must be understood as an intellectual heritage that reinforces the values of moderation, tolerance, and diversity within the framework of ummah unity.
References
[1] A. A. Bakar and S. Sahman, “The Renewing of Usul Al-Fiqh: Challenges, Limitations and Future Directions,” Indones. J. Islam. Econ. Law, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 105–122, 2024.
[2] A. H. Al Ghazali and I. Ulumuddin, “Menghidupkan Ilmu-ilmu Agama,” Ihya Ulumuddin. Terjem. Purwanto. Bandung Penerbit Marja, 2016.
[3] M. Abu Zahra, “The Four Imams: Their Lives, Works, and Their Schools of Thought,” Dar Al Taqwa Ltd., London, pp. p1-422, 2001.
[4] A. M. Najib, “AMAL AHLU AL-MADINAH SEBAGAI SUMBER HUKUM ISLAM (Pandangan Imam Malik Ibn Anas Dalam Kitab Al-Muwatta),” Al-Mazaahib J. Perbandingan Huk., vol. 1, no. 2, 2012.
[5] D. Elliott, “Wind power: Opportunities, limits and challenges,” in Learning from wind power: Governance, societal and policy perspectives on sustainable energy, Springer, 2012, pp. 17–37.
[6] T. Ramadan, Islam, the West and the Challenges of Modernity. Kube Publishing Ltd, 2009.
[7] T. Taufikurrahman and R. D. Sasmita, “Islam Dan Pluralitas Sosial Keberagaman Di Indonesia,” AL-ALLAM, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–124, 2024.
[8] A. Daharis and M. Bahar, “Streams of Law in Islam, the History of the Emergence of Legal Schools, and Differences of Opinion Regarding the Position of Legal Sources,” Int. J. Heal. Econ. Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 384–394, 2025.
[9] T. J. Al-Alwani, Issues in contemporary Islamic thought. iiit, 2005.
[10] R. A. Fitria, J. Jalaluddin, F. Azhari, and F. Hamdi, “Historisitas, Setting sosial, Intelektual dan Produk Pemikiran Hukum Islam Madzhab Arba’ah (Hanafi, Maliki, Syafi’i, dan Hanbali),” Indones. J. Islam. Jurisprudence, Econ. Leg. Theory, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 700–729, 2024.
[11] A. Duderija and H. Rane, “Minority Fiqh (Fiqh al-Aqalliyyat),” in Islam and Muslims in the West: Major Issues and Debates, Springer, 2018, pp. 209–229.
[12] M. H. Kamali, “Islam and sustainable development,” ICR J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 8–26, 2016.
[13] I. A. K. Nyazee, Islamic jurisprudence. Lulu. com, 2019.
[14] S. Hasan, “Islamic jurisprudence: Sources and traditions creating diversity in human relationships,” in The Muslim world in the 21st century: Space, power, and human development, Springer, 2012, pp. 23–42.
[15] T. A. Parray, “The legal methodology of ‘fiqh al-aqalliyyat’ and its critics: An analytical study,” J. Muslim Minor. Aff., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 88–107, 2012.
[16] T. Saumantri and H. Hajam, “Urgensi Metodologi Studi Islam Interdisipliner Untuk Moderasi Islam,” An-Nawa J. Stud. Islam, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2023.
[17] H. K. Mohajan, “Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects,” J. Econ. Dev. Environ. people, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 23–48, 2018.
[18] T. Kuran, “Islamic economics and the Islamic subeconomy,” J. Econ. Perspect., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 155–173, 1995.
[19] M. Kahf, “Instruments and alternatives of public debts in Islamic economy,” Res. Pap. Present. IRTI, pp. 1–57, 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Miftahurrizki Miftahurrizki, Deni Ardiansyah, M. Bahri Ghazali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com