Bibliometric Analysis of Human-Computer Interaction

Authors

  • Loso Judijanto IPOSS Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v4i05.2911

Keywords:

Human–Computer Interaction, Bibliometric Analysis, VOSviewer, Artificial Intelligence, User Experience

Abstract

Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) has emerged as a multidisciplinary field that bridges computer science, artificial intelligence, psychology, and design to improve the interaction between humans and digital technologies. This study aims to analyze the intellectual structure, research trends, collaboration patterns, and emerging themes within the HCI literature through a bibliometric approach. Data were collected from the Scopus database using the keyword “Human–Computer Interaction” and related terms. Bibliometric analysis and visualization were conducted using VOSviewer to examine publication networks, keyword co-occurrences, citation structures, co-authorship relationships, institutional collaborations, and country-level research partnerships. The findings reveal that HCI research is centered on themes such as user interfaces, user experience, artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer vision, gesture recognition, virtual reality, and augmented reality. Overlay visualization indicates a recent shift toward advanced technologies, particularly deep learning, emotion recognition, convolutional neural networks, and intelligent interaction systems. Citation analysis identifies several highly influential publications that have shaped the theoretical and methodological foundations of the field, while collaboration analyses highlight the significant roles of the United States, China, and India, alongside leading institutions such as Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Washington. The results demonstrate that HCI research is increasingly interdisciplinary and globally collaborative, reflecting the growing demand for intelligent, adaptive, and user-centered technologies. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of HCI research and offers insights into future directions, particularly in the areas of AI-driven interaction, multimodal recognition, immersive environments, and personalized digital experiences.

References

[1] Y. Pastor, V. Pérez-Torres, H. Thomas-Currás, L. L. Lobato-Rincón, M. Á. López-Sáez, and A. García, “A study of the influence of altruism, social responsibility, reciprocity, and the subjective norm on online prosocial behavior in adolescence,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 154, p. 108156, 2024.

[2] Y. Zhang, “Study on Customer Loyalty of Cross-border Import E-commerce Platform Based on Human-Computer Interactive User Experience,” Highlights Business, Econ. Manag., vol. 10, pp. 1–10, 2023.

[3] U. Bunz, C. Curry, and W. Voon, “Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2321–2344, 2007.

[4] S. Tongsubanan and K. Kasemsarn, “Developing a design guideline for a user-friendly home energy-saving application that aligns with user-centered design (UCD) principles,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 7424–7446, 2025.

[5] E. Zulaikha and M. Brereton, “Communication choices to engage participation of rural Indonesian craftspeople in development projects,” in Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2013: 14th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, September 2-6, 2013, Proceedings, Part I 14, Springer, 2013, pp. 780–787.

[6] S. R. Ahmed et al., “Deep Learning for Customer Relationship Management in E-commerce,” 2024 Int. Congr. Human-Computer Interact. Optim. Robot. Appl., pp. 1–7, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:270398037

[7] J. C. Barrett, B. Fry, J. Maller, and M. J. Daly, “Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps,” Bioinformatics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 263–265, 2005.

[8] S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, and L. Nacke, “From game design elements to gamefulness: defining" gamification",” in Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, 2011, pp. 9–15.

[9] A. Bangor, P. T. Kortum, and J. T. Miller, “An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale,” Intl. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 574–594, 2008.

[10] D. Warde-Farley et al., “The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 38, no. suppl_2, pp. W214–W220, 2010.

[11] C. Schuldt, I. Laptev, and B. Caputo, “Recognizing human actions: a local SVM approach,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004., IEEE, 2004, pp. 32–36.

[12] R. Parasuraman, T. B. Sheridan, and C. D. Wickens, “A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation,” IEEE Trans. Syst. man, Cybern. A Syst. Humans, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 286–297, 2000.

[13] N. Epley, A. Waytz, and J. T. Cacioppo, “On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 114, no. 4, p. 864, 2007.

[14] M.-H. Yang, D. J. Kriegman, and N. Ahuja, “Detecting faces in images: A survey,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 34–58, 2002.

[15] T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn, “A survey of socially interactive robots,” Rob. Auton. Syst., vol. 42, no. 3–4, pp. 143–166, 2003.

[16] T. Sing, O. Sander, N. Beerenwinkel, and T. Lengauer, “ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R,” Bioinformatics, vol. 21, no. 20, pp. 3940–3941, 2005.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Bibliometric Analysis of Human-Computer Interaction (L. Judijanto, Trans.). (2026). West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(05), 975-984. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v4i05.2911