A Model for Regenerative Regional Development Based on Ecosystems, Community Participation, and Environmental Policy in Papua
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v4i03.2684Keywords:
Regenerative Regional Development, Ecosystem-Based Development, Community Participation, Environmental Policy, Papua, IndonesiaAbstract
This study develops and empirically tests a regenerative regional development model integrating ecosystem-based development, community participation, and environmental policy in Papua, Indonesia. Regenerative development extends beyond conventional sustainability by emphasizing ecosystem restoration, social inclusion, and institutional effectiveness within socio-ecological systems. Despite its growing conceptual relevance, empirical validation of integrated regenerative models in peripheral and ecologically sensitive regions remains limited. Using a quantitative explanatory design, primary data were collected from 110 stakeholders involved in regional development and environmental governance in Papua and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The results indicate that environmental policy plays a central and dominant role in shaping regenerative regional development, demonstrating a strong and significant direct effect. Community participation and ecosystem-based development do not show significant direct effects on regenerative outcomes; however, both exert significant indirect effects through environmental policy. These findings confirm the mediating role of environmental policy as an institutional mechanism that translates ecological principles and participatory processes into measurable regenerative outcomes. The model explains 64.8% of the variance in regenerative regional development and demonstrates strong predictive relevance. The study contributes theoretically by operationalizing regenerative development into measurable constructs, methodologically by applying SEM-PLS to an integrated socio-ecological framework, and practically by providing evidence-based guidance for policymakers seeking inclusive and ecologically grounded development pathways in Papua and similar regions.
References
[1] R. Yunibandhu and P. Hallinger, “From sustainability to regeneration: mapping the conceptual foundations and future directions of regenerative development,” Sustain. Dev., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 8569–8585, 2025.
[2] V. Taveras-Dalmau, S. Becken, and R. Westoby, “From paradigm blindness to paradigm shift? An integrative review and critical analysis of the regenerative paradigm,” Ambio, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 1985–2004, 2025.
[3] L. V Gibbons, “Moving beyond sustainability: A regenerative community development framework for co-creating thriving living systems and its application,” J. Sustain. Dev., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 20–52, 2020.
[4] C. Du Plessis, “Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 7–22, 2012.
[5] L. F. Axinte, A. Mehmood, T. Marsden, and D. Roep, “Regenerative city-regions: a new conceptual framework,” Reg. Stud. Reg. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 117–129, 2019.
[6] B. S. Caniglia, “The centrality of the systems approach: Regenerative development, resilience, and sustainability,” in Regenerative urban development, climate change and the common good, Routledge, 2019, pp. 34–48.
[7] B. D. Dias, “Regenerative development–building evolutive capacity for healthy living systems,” Int. J. Des. Nat. ecodynamics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 315–323, 2018.
[8] J. Plaut, B. Dunbar, H. Gotthelf, and D. Hes, “Regenerative Development through LENSES with a case study of Seacombe West,” Environ. Des. Guid., pp. 1–19, 2016.
[9] J. J. McIntyre-Mills, N. R. A. Romm, A. Arko-Achemfuor, and J. Karel, “Systemic Praxis: Steps Towards Re-generation,” in From Polarisation to Multispecies Relationships: Re-Generation of the Commons in the Era of Mass Extinctions, Springer, 2021, pp. 615–644.
[10] A. M. G. Arce and E. Fisher, “Participatory development,” Int. Encycl. Anthropol., pp. 1–7, 2018.
[11] E. J. Park, E. Kang, and Y. Shin, “Urban regeneration and community participation: a critical review of project-based research,” Open House Int., 2025.
[12] A. Smith, “Applying the lessons learnt: community involvement in regeneration,” Public Policy Adm., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 145–152, 2008.
[13] T. Binns, “About development,” Asp. Teach. Second. Geogr. Perspect. Pract., p. 264, 2003.
[14] J. Glückler and R. Lenz, “How institutions moderate the effectiveness of regional policy: A framework and research agenda,” Investig. Reg. Reg. Res., no. 36, pp. 255–277, 2016.
[15] R. N. Warong, A. A. Musa, and D. W. Lumintang, “Tinjauan Hukum Efektifitas Kedudukan dan Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Izin Pengelolaan Lingkungan,” Nuansa Akad. J. Pembang. Masy., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 211–222, 2025.
[16] Y. Y. K. Dazagbyilo, H. Wu, E. G. Norgie, A. S. Lawi, and S. Ahmed, “Policy and Governance for Environmental Implementation: Effectiveness of environmental laws and regulatory frameworks,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 964–997, 2025, doi: 10.30574/ijsra.2025.16.3.2649.
[17] A. Veijalainen, M. Grenman, and J. Räikkönen, “KATSAUS: Kun kestävyys ei riitä–Kohti regeneratiivista kulutusta?,” Kulutustutkimus. Nyt, vol. 17, no. 1–2, pp. 113–121, 2023.
[18] T. P. G. da Silva, F. G. do Nascimento, J. A. da Silva, and A. M. C. Soares, “Turismo regenerativo: uma análise da atuação da Biofábrica de Corais em Porto de Galinhas/PE,” Cad. Virtual Tur., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 51–75, 2025.
[19] H. W. de Lima, “TURISMO REGENERATIVO: UMA ABORDAGEM TRANSFORMADORA PARA ECOSSISTEMAS E COMUNIDADES LOCAIS,” RECIMA21-Revista Científica Multidiscip. 2675-6218, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. e5126075–e5126075, 2024.
[20] L. V Gibbons, “Regenerative landscape development: A transformational methodology for thrivability of landscapes,” in Current trends in landscape research, Springer, 2019, pp. 321–338.
[21] S. Zhao, “Concept of ecosystem services and ecosystem management,” in Ecosystem Services and Management Strategy in China, Springer, 2013, pp. 7–12.
[22] B. Seibert, “Integrating ecosystem services into development planning: a new paradigm in biodiversity and ecosystem conservation,” Agric. Dev. Notes, vol. 6, pp. 1–4, 2016.
[23] A. Ismail et al., “Sustainable management of natural resources for environmental sustainability,” Ecorestoration Sustain., pp. 417–438, 2023.
[24] R. Cormier, “Ecosystem-based management: more than 100 Years of principles, concepts, and approaches,” 2024.
[25] F. Van Dyke and R. L. Lamb, “Conservation through ecosystem management,” in Conservation Biology: Foundations, Concepts, Applications, Springer, 2020, pp. 359–410.
[26] V. Sharma, “Revisiting arnstein’sa ladder of citizen participation: Strengths and limitations in the 21st century,” Res. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 75–80, 2025.
[27] P. S. Margareta and S. Salahudin, “Community participation in regional development planning: A literature review,” Transform. J. Manaj. Pemerintah., pp. 121–132, 2021.
[28] I. N. F. Dewanti, R. C. T. H. Permana, I. Andini, and Kusumastuti, “Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Program Pelestarian Lingkungan di Kawasan Bendhung Lepen Kampung Mrican, Kota Yogyakarta,” Konstr. Publ. Ilmu Tek. Perenc. Tata Ruang dan Tek. Sipil, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:280440412
[29] K. Nalu, A. Zahruddin, Suripto, and Y. Anggoro, “Transformation of Social Values in Political Policy: A Case Study of Community Participation in Regional Development,” J. Polit. Gov., vol. 2, pp. 1–12, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.62872/10e8e645.
[30] M. Howlett, “Policy instruments and policy implementation for sustainable development governance,” in Handbook on the Governance of Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, pp. 145–160.
[31] G. D. Sagita and E. R. Budi, “Regional Rights, Environmental Wrongs: Unpacking the Paradox of Autonomy in Indonesia’s Environmental Governance,” Indones. J. Environ. Law Sustain. Dev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 191–228, 2024.
[32] D. Russel, “Policy integration for sustainable development governance,” in Handbook on the Governance of Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, pp. 132–144.
[33] D. Cañón Rodríguez, “Aporte a la construcción de comunidades sostenibles. Un modelo para analizar su sostenibilidad.” Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2024.
[34] M. D. McGinnis and E. Ostrom, “Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 19, no. 2, 2014.
[35] R. C. H. Gómez and P. A. Ramos, “La restauración socioecológica: Potencialidades del uso del enfoque de los sistemas socioecológicos y el marco analítico de sistemas de innovación social,” Ecol. Austral, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 839–851, 2023.
[36] N. M. Alonso and J. L. F. Casadevante, “Biorregiones,” Ecol. Política, no. 66, pp. 90–94, 2023.
[37] D. P. Edwards and G. R. Cerullo, “Biodiversity is central for restoration,” Curr. Biol., vol. 34, no. 9, pp. R371–R379, 2024.
[38] T. Howard, “The ‘Rules of Engagement’: A Socio-legal Framework for Improving Community Engagement in Natural Resource Governance,” Oñati Socio-Legal Ser., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1209–1235, 2015.
[39] A. Pani and P. Mishra, “Policies and community participation for integrated natural resource management: a review of transdisciplinary perspective,” J. Soc. Econ. Dev., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 211–233, 2022.
[40] A. Zervaki, “The ecosystem Approach in Ocean planning and governance,” Ecosyst. Approach Public Engagem. Ocean Gov. Case Marit. Spat. Plan., 2018.
[41] H. M. Leslie et al., “Operationalizing the social-ecological systems framework to assess sustainability,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 112, no. 19, pp. 5979–5984, 2015.
[42] D. S. Slocombe, “Environmental planning, ecosystem science, and ecosystem approaches for integrating environment and development,” Environ. Manage., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 289–303, 1993.
[43] A. Riduan, “Citizen Participation in Policy Decision-Making,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Approach Sci. Technol., vol. 1, pp. 65–74, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.62207/fz1xn342.
[44] K. H. Bangura, “The Participation of Stakeholders in Community Policy Planning and Implementation. A Case Study: Freetown City Council, Sierra Leone,” Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol., 2025, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:281687654
[45] J. Newig and O. Fritsch, “Environmental governance: participatory, multi‐level–and effective?,” Environ. policy Gov., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 197–214, 2009.
[46] J. Newig, N. W. Jager, E. Challies, and E. Kochskämper, “Does stakeholder participation improve environmental governance? Evidence from a meta-analysis of 305 case studies,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 82, p. 102705, 2023.
[47] A. Agrawal, S. Brandhorst, M. Jain, C. Liao, N. Pradhan, and D. Solomon, “From environmental governance to governance for sustainability,” One Earth, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 615–621, 2022.
[48] K. Y. Botah, “Why institutions matter: analysis of their significance in shaping economic, environmental, and policy transformation,” J. Soc. Policy Issues, pp. 79–87, 2024.
[49] E. Kelemen et al., “Signposts on the road toward transformative governance: how a stronger focus on diverse values can enhance environmental policies,” Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., vol. 64, p. 101351, 2023.
[50] L. Lundqvist, “Governing in common—integration and effectiveness in ecological governance,” Sweden Ecol. Gov. Straddling Fence, pp. 117–147, 2004.
[51] L. Delgado, P. Bachmann, and B. Oñate, “Gobernanza ambiental: una estrategia orientada al desarrollo sustentable local a través de la participación ciudadana,” 2007.
[52] E. Laurent, “Social-Ecology: exploring the missing link in sustainable development,” 2015.
[53] A. Goria, A. Sgobbi, and I. von Homeyer, Governance for the environment: a comparative analysis of environmental policy integration. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Halomoan Hutajulu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com