Analysis of Regional-Based Fisheries Potential Development Strategies in Papua
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v4i01.2573Keywords:
Papua, Fisheries-Based Regional Development, SWOT Analysis, Development Strategies, Sustainable Marine ResourcesAbstract
Large capture-fisheries and aquaculture potential in Papua Province has yet to meet the reality of regional development based on fisheries, due to infrastructure gaps, limited value-added processing, weak institutions, and continuous external risks. This study assesses the regional-based fisheries potential development strategy in Papua Province to increase coastal community welfare without compromising resource sustainability. Secondary data from the period of 2003–2024 are combined with stakeholder inputs from surveys, interviews, and focus group discussions and analyzed by using a SWOT framework supported by IFAS–EFAS weighting to identify strategic priorities. The mean IFAS score revealed that internal strengths (3.27) outweighed weaknesses (1.53), largely attributed to abundant fish resources, emerging fishing/processing technologies, government support, market potential, and local wisdom of coastal areas. Results from EFAS revealed that the mean opportunities (3.16) outweigh threats (1.81), particularly export demand, progress in technology, government programs, and digital marketing prospects, although illegal fishing, overfishing pressures, climate variability, and conflict over fishing grounds remained the key concerns. The position here is in the first quadrant, denoting an area where the fishery can grow well and indicates the need to focus more on Strength-Opportunity (SO) plans involving the optimization of export-directed manufacturing, the enhancement of fish processing facilities to increase value addition to fish, and the use of e-commerce and online marketing, as well as the use of local economic institutions to improve fish distribution, and the development of networks based on local culture to ensure superior processed fish products.
References
[1] H. Hutajulu, T. Kusumastanto, S. Budiharsono, and Z. Imran, “Economic policy in the development of capture fisheries in Jayapura City,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2019, p. 12027.
[2] J. Friedman and W. Allonso, “Regional Economic Development and Planning,” Reg. Econ. Centre, Nagoya, Japan, 2008.
[3] Statistik Perikanan Indonesia 2022, “Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia,” KKP Republik Indonesia, 2023. https://portaldata.kkp.go.id/portals/data-statistik/layer1
[4] D. Natalia, “Kinerja Daya Saing Produk Perikanan Indonesia Di Pasar Global,” Bul. Ilm. Litbang Perdagang., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 69–88, 2012.
[5] B. Papua, “Provinsi Papua Dalam Angka 2023,” 2023. https://papua.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/02/28/68b848a54207a64d0c42ddb6/provinsi-papua-dalam-angka-2023.html
[6] B. Prishardoyo, “Analisis Tingkat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Potensi Ekonomi Terhadap Produk Domestik Regional Bruto (PDRB) Kabupaten Pati Tahun 2000-2005,” JEJAK J. Ekon. dan Kebijak., vol. 1, no. 1, 2008.
[7] M. R. Ramdhany, “Analisis komoditas unggulan sub sektor pertanian terpilih berdasarkan volume produksi di Kabupaten Malang,” Skripsi. Univ. Brawijaya Malang, 2018.
[8] S. Surani, M. Iek, H. Hutajulu, and Y. Hafizrianda, “Pengaruh Investasi Terhadap Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja Di Sektor Industri Di Provinsi Papua Tahun 2007–2018,” J. Manag. Small Mediu. Enterp., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 277–290, 2021.
[9] Statistical yearbook world food and agriculture 2022, “Food and Agriculturre Organization,” FAO, 2022. https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1626880/
[10] M. Sholihah, “Analisis Pengaruh Suku Bunga, Inflasi, dan Nilai Tukar terhadap Harga Saham pada Perusahaan Jasa Perhotelan dan Pariwisata yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia.” Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2014.
[11] B. Setyadji, S. Patmiarsih, and S. A. Raup, “Evaluasi Awal Penggunaan E-Log Book Sebagai Data Dasar Pengelolaan Perikanan Tuna yang Berkelanjutan,” J. Kebijak. Perikan. Indones., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 85–94, 2021.
[12] H. S. Gordon, “The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery,” Bull. Math. Biol., vol. 53, no. 1–2, pp. 231–252, 1991.
[13] I. M. Putra, Pengembangan wilayah. Prokreatif Media, 2023.
[14] S. P. K. PERIKANAN, “Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan,” Satu Data.[Internet].[diacu 2019 Desember 29]. Tersedia dari https//kkp. go. id/djpb/artikel/304-kkp-tegaskankinerja-neraca-perdagangan-ikan-kerapu-positif, 2018.
[15] A. D. Kurniawati and H. Cahyono, “Optimalisasi Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Daerah dengan Analisis Sektor Unggulan di Papua,” Indep. J. Econ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 49–63, 2022.
[16] L. Adam, “Kebijakan pelarangan penangkapan ikan tuna sirip kuning: Analisis dampak dan solusinya,” J. Ekon. dan Kebijak. Publik, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 215–227, 2016.
[17] I. W. Gunawan and S. Arka, “Pengaruh UMR dan pendidikan terhadap kesempatan kerja dan pertumbuhan ekonomi kabupaten/kota Provinsi Bali,” E-Jurnal Ekon. Dan Bisnis Univ. Udayana, vol. 459, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Halomoan Hutajulu, Rachmaeny Indahyani, Eko Joko Nugroho, Sri Damayanti Toding

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








