Mobilising Hope: A Quantitative Study of Donor Behaviour in a Crowdfunding Campaign in Kerala

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v4i01.2535

Keywords:

Crowdfunding, Donor Behaviour, Financial Transparency, Collective Action, Social Media Mobilisation

Abstract

Crowdfunding is a powerful mechanism for mobilising financial resources for humanitarian and crisis-related causes. This study examines Kerala donation-based crowdfunding in 2024 for the release of Abdul Rahim from the death penalty in Saudi Arabia. The research employs a quantitative methodology to analyse the donor behaviour, such as motivations, perceptions of transparency and engagement in the campaign. The data was collected through a survey via Google Forms, which collected 139 responses. The study’s findings highlight the role of social media in promoting crowdfunding efforts, the psychological underpinnings of donor behaviour, emphasising the motivations and perceptions of the donor, and the importance of financial transparency in fostering trust. The results provide the importance of a framework for designing effective, transparent, and emotionally compelling crowdfunding campaigns that emphasise the role of digital platforms, collective action, and psychological motivators in crisis-driven fundraising through social media mobilisation.

Author Biography

  • Mary Sam, Christ (Deemed to be University)

    Research Scholar, Department of Psychology, Christ (Deemed to be University)

References

[1] I. Alegre and M. Moleskis, “Crowdfunding: a review and research agenda,” Available SSRN 2900921, 2016.

[2] R. B. Bouncken, M. Komorek, and S. Kraus, “Crowdfunding: The current state of research,” Int. Bus. Econ. Res. J., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 407–416, 2015.

[3] J. C. Short, D. J. Ketchen Jr, A. F. McKenny, T. H. Allison, and R. D. Ireland, “Research on crowdfunding: Reviewing the (very recent) past and celebrating the present,” Entrep. theory Pract., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 149–160, 2017.

[4] M. M. Hoque, “Crowdfunding for innovation: a comprehensive empirical review,” Futur. Bus. J., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 102, 2024.

[5] E. Mollick, “The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2014.

[6] R. Shneor and A. A. Vik, “Crowdfunding success: a systematic literature review 2010–2017,” Balt. J. Manag., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 149–182, 2020.

[7] K. Efrat, S. Gilboa, and A. Sherman, “The role of supporter engagement in enhancing crowdfunding success,” Balt. J. Manag., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 199–213, 2020.

[8] A. Behl, P. Dutta, Z. Luo, and P. Sheorey, “Enabling artificial intelligence on a donation-based crowdfunding platform: a theoretical approach,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 319, no. 1, pp. 761–789, 2022.

[9] E. M. Gerber and J. Hui, “Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation,” ACM Trans. Comput. Interact., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1–32, 2013.

[10] B. Simpson, M. Schreier, S. Bitterl, and K. White, “Making the world a better place: How crowdfunding increases consumer demand for social-good products,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 363–376, 2021.

[11] S. Bitterl and M. Schreier, “When consumers become project backers: The psychological consequences of participation in crowdfunding,” Int. J. Res. Mark., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 673–685, 2018.

[12] S. Rose, D. Wentzel, C. Hopp, and J. Kaminski, “Launching for success: The effects of psychological distance and mental simulation on funding decisions and crowdfunding performance,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 36, no. 6, p. 106021, 2021.

[13] R. Ceballos, W. Hou, E. Levitas, and S. M. Price, “The product, the mind and the heart of crowdfunding: The effect of signals on technology projects,” Int. J. Serv. Stand., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 79–99, 2017.

[14] D. Popescul, L. D. Radu, V. D. Păvăloaia, and M. R. Georgescu, “Psychological determinants of investor motivation in social media-based crowdfunding projects: A systematic review,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, p. 588121, 2020.

[15] J. Neuhaus, A. Isaak, and D. Bostandzic, “Million dollar personality: A systematic literature review on personality in crowdfunding,” Manag. Rev. Q., vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 309–345, 2022.

[16] E. Kromidha and P. Robson, “Social identity and signalling success factors in online crowdfunding,” Entrep. Reg. Dev., vol. 28, no. 9–10, pp. 605–629, 2016.

[17] G. Cecere, F. Le Guel, and F. Rochelandet, “Crowdfunding and social influence: an empirical investigation,” Appl. Econ., vol. 49, no. 57, pp. 5802–5813, 2017.

[18] J. Andreoni, “Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving,” Econ. J., vol. 100, no. 401, pp. 464–477, 1990.

[19] A. Necib and S. Mourad, “Digital transformation and finan digital transformation and finance: Analysis of economic development strategies: The case of crowdfunding,” Pakistan Rev. Soc. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 2024.

[20] Y. Rodriguez-Ricardo, M. Sicilia, and M. López, “What drives crowdfunding participation? The influence of personal and social traits,” Spanish J. Mark., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 163–182, 2018.

[21] Kozhikode News, “Abdul Rahim Fund: Committee to Decide on Remaining ₹11.6 Crore after Blood Money Payments,” Times of India. (n.d.), 2024. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kozhikode/abdul-rahim-fund-committee-to-decide-on-remaining-116-crore-after-blood-money-payments/articleshow/115341302.cms

[22] The Economic Times-News, “Abdul Rahim: ‘Real Kerala Story’: Keralites crowdfund Rs 35.45 cr to save man on death row in Saudi,” The Economic Times. (n.d.), 2025. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/real-kerala-story-keralites-crowdfund-rs-35-45-cr-to-save-man-on-death-row-in-saudi/articleshow/109265636.cms?from=mdr

[23] T. H. Bureau, “Kerala man’s release from Saudi jail: Blood money of ₹34 crore raised through crowd-funding transferred to MEA,” The Hindu, 2024. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/kerala-mans-release-from-saudi-jail-blood-money-of-34-crore-raised-through-crowd-funding-transferred-to-mea/article68210401.ece

[24] C. D. Batson, J. G. Batson, J. K. Slingsby, K. L. Harrell, H. M. Peekna, and R. M. Todd, “Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 61, no. 3, p. 413, 1991.

[25] I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991.

[26] H. Tajfel, J. Turner, W. G. Austin, and S. Worchel, “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict,” Intergr. relations Essent. readings, pp. 94–109, 2001.

[27] R. B. Cialdini, “The science of persuasion,” Sci. Am. Mind, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 70–77, 2004.

[28] Q. L. Van Den Hoogen, “Values in crowdfunding in the Netherlands,” Int. J. Cult. Policy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 109–127, 2020.

[29] J. Ren, V. Raghupathi, and W. Raghupathi, “Exploring the subjective nature of crowdfunding decisions,” J. Bus. Ventur. Insights, vol. 15, p. e00233, 2021.

[30] I. H. Kenang and G. Gosal, “Factors affecting online donation intention in donation-based crowdfunding,” J. Winners, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 2021.

[31] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality,” J. Res. Pers., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 109–134, 1985.

[32] L. Zhao and Z. Sun, “Pure donation or hybrid donation crowdfunding: Which model is more conducive to prosocial campaign success?,” Balt. J. Manag., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 237–260, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28

How to Cite

Mobilising Hope: A Quantitative Study of Donor Behaviour in a Crowdfunding Campaign in Kerala (F. PC & K. . Mary Sam , Trans.). (2026). West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(01), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v4i01.2535