Soil Health and Fertility in Agriculture: A Bibliometric Mapping of Global Knowledge and Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v3i11.2382Keywords:
Soil Fertility, Soil Science, Bibliometric Analysis, Sustainable Agriculture, Soil Microbiology, International Collaboration, Climate Change, Food SecurityAbstract
This study delineates the worldwide terrain of soil science research through bibliometric and network analysis to discern topic trends, conceptual frameworks, and patterns of international collaboration. Data obtained from Scopus and Web of Science were analyzed using VOSviewer to depict keyword co-occurrences, author networks, institutional connections, and international collaborations. The results indicate that soil fertility is the primary emphasis of the discipline, intricately associated with related topics including soil microbiology, nutrient dynamics, crop production, and sustainable agriculture. Emerging research domains—such as biochar, climate change effects, microplastics, biodiversity, and food security—indicate a transition towards sustainability-focused and ecologically integrated methodologies. Collaboration networks identify India, China, and European nations as prominent research centers, bolstered by robust institutional and transdisciplinary alliances. The study offers useful insights; yet, it is constrained by database coverage and dependence on quantitative measurements. The findings enhance comprehension of worldwide research trends and provide guidance for future investigations that incorporate ecological resilience, agricultural innovation, and climate-adaptive soil management.
References
[1] Unesco, The Salamanca Statement and Framework for action on special needs education: adopted by the World Conference on Special Needs Education; Access and Quality. Salamanca, Spain, 7-10 June 1994. Unesco, 1994.
[2] U. Nations, “Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), U,” New York Div. Soc. Policy Dev. Disabil., pp. 1–31, 2006.
[3] E. UNESCO, “2030–Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action,” Pars UNESCO, 2015.
[4] M. Ainscow and M. Viola, “Developing inclusive and equitable education systems: some lessons from Uruguay,” Int. J. Incl. Educ., vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 3568–3584, 2024.
[5] L. Florian and K. Black-Hawkins, “Exploring inclusive pedagogy,” Br. Educ. Res. J., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 813–828, 2011.
[6] W. Yan, Preparing Teachers for Inclusive Education in China. Routledge, 2023.
[7] R. Slee, “Belonging in an age of exclusion,” 2019, Taylor & Francis.
[8] A. de Boer and S. J. Pijl, “The acceptance and rejection of peers with ADHD and ASD in general secondary education,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 325–332, 2016.
[9] K. Göransson and C. Nilholm, “Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings–a critical analysis of research on inclusive education,” Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 265–280, 2014.
[10] R. Opertti, Z. Walker, and Y. Zhang, “Inclusive education: From targeting groups and schools to achieving quality education as the core of EFA,” SAGE Handb. Spec. Educ., vol. 2, pp. 149–169, 2014.
[11] S. J. Peters, “Inclusive education: Achieving education for all by including those with disabilities and special education needs,” Washingt. DC World Bank, pp. 1–133, 2003.
[12] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021.
[13] A. Ramos‐Rodríguez and J. Ruíz‐Navarro, “Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 981–1004, 2004.
[14] V. Teixeira, A. Correia, E. Monteiro, A. C. H. Kuok, and C. Forlin, “Placement, inclusion, law and teachers’ perceptions in Macao’s schools,” Int. J. Incl. Educ., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1014–1032, 2018.
[15] M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” bmj, vol. 372, 2021.
[16] M. E. Falagas, E. I. Pitsouni, G. A. Malietzis, and G. Pappas, “Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses,” FASEB J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 338–342, 2008.
[17] D. Papaioannou, A. Sutton, and A. Booth, “Systematic approaches to a successful literature review,” Syst. approaches to a Success. Lit. Rev., pp. 1–336, 2016.
[18] H. F. Moed, Citation analysis in research evaluation. Springer, 2005.
[19] N. Van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010.
[20] M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” J. Informetr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017.
[21] P. A. Sanchez, “Soil fertility and hunger in Africa,” Science (80-. )., vol. 295, no. 5562, pp. 2019–2020, 2002.
[22] O. Y. A. Costa, J. M. Raaijmakers, and E. E. Kuramae, “Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: ecological function and impact on soil aggregation,” Front. Microbiol., vol. 9, p. 1636, 2018.
[23] D. Bhardwaj, M. W. Ansari, R. K. Sahoo, and N. Tuteja, “Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity,” Microb. Cell Fact., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 66, 2014.
[24] F. Wang, Q. Wang, C. A. Adams, Y. Sun, and S. Zhang, “Effects of microplastics on soil properties: current knowledge and future perspectives,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 424, p. 127531, 2022.
[25] N. A. Qambrani, M. M. Rahman, S. Won, S. Shim, and C. Ra, “Biochar properties and eco-friendly applications for climate change mitigation, waste management, and wastewater treatment: A review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 79, pp. 255–273, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Loso Judijanto, Elik Murni Ningtias Ningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com