Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights as Collateral in Government Regulation No. 24/2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v3i09.2271Keywords:
Intellectual Property Rights, Credit Agreements, Consumer Protection, Creative Economy, IndonesiaAbstract
The rapid development of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is closely linked to advances in technology, information, and communication. The existence of IPR enhances the quality of produced goods, thereby supporting economic growth. To foster the development of the creative economy in Indonesia, Law No. 24 of 2019 on the Creative Economy was enacted, with its implementation further regulated under Government Regulation No. 24 of 2022, which, among other provisions, addresses financing schemes. Using a normative juridical research method with a statutory approach, the findings reveal that IPR asset valuation can be conducted through the Cost-Based Approach, Market-Based Approach, Income-Based Approach, and other valuation methods, in accordance with applicable valuation standards. Regarding legal protection for creditors, the Consumer Protection Law applies.
References
[1] F. H. Habullah, Hukum Kebendaan Perdata Hak Hak Yang Memberikan Jaminan. Jakarta: Ind Hill.Co, 2005.
[2] UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Secured Transaction Supplement on Security Rights in Intellectual Property. New York: United Nations, 2011.
[3] Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta.
[4] Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Paten.
[5] T. H. I. Husny, “Tantangan Dalam Implementasi Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Pembiayaan Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2022,” J. Ilmu Sos. dan Pendidik., vol. 7, no. 3, 2023.
[6] R. F. Mayana and T. Santika, “Intellectual property-based financing scheme for creative industry in Indonesia: Policy, progress, challenges and potential solutions,” J. World Intellect. Prop., vol. 28, pp. 95–113, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12322.
[7] C. Le, B. Nguyen, and V. Vo, “Do intangible assets help SMEs in underdeveloped markets gain access to external finance?-the case of Vietnam,” Small Bus Econ, vol. 68, pp. 833–855, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00785-z.
[8] E. Wahjudi, “Factors affecting dividend policy in manufacturing companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange,” J. Manag. Dev., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 4–17, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-07-2018-0211.
[9] R. Haron, N. M. Nomran, A. H. A. Othman, M. M. Husin, and A. Sharofiddin, “The influence of firm, industry and concentrated ownership on dynamic capital structure decision in emerging market,” J. Asia Bus. Stud., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 689–709, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-04-2019-0109.
[10] A. Alimov, “Intellectual property rights reform and the cost of corporate debt,” J. Int. Money Financ., vol. 91, pp. 195–211, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2018.12.004.
[11] O. A. Thakur, M. B. Tunde, B.-A. A. Noordin, M. K. Alam, and M. A. Prabowo, “The relationship between goodwill and capital structure and the moderating effect of financial market development,” J. Econ. Financ. Adm. Sci., vol. 29, no. 57, pp. 121–145, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-04-2022-0107.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhamad Andre Nurdiansah, Evan Rayhan Revendy, Ahmad Nathique Bil Haqi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com