Analysis of Global Research Trends in Psychological Approaches and Behavioural Change to Waste Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v3i09.2053Keywords:
Behavioural Change, Psychological Approaches, Waste Management, Research Trends, Bibliometric AnalysisAbstract
The integration of psychological perspectives into waste management research has gained significant momentum in recent decades, reflecting a growing emphasis on behaviour-driven solutions to environmental challenges. This bibliometric analysis aims to systematically map the scientific landscape at the intersection of psychological interventions and waste management from 1992 to 2024, highlighting trends, thematic evolution, and collaboration patterns. A total of 1927 records were retrieved from the Scopus and Web of Science databases and analysed using the Bibliometrix R-package. The study explores annual publication trends, core journal sources, influential authors, country-wise scientific production, and conceptual structures through keyword co-occurrence, factorial mapping, and thematic analysis. Findings reveal a steady increase in annual scientific production, with exponential growth post-2010 and a record peak in 2024, indicating rising academic and policy interest in pro-environmental behaviour. Core journals such as Sustainability, Journal of Cleaner Production, and Waste Management dominate the publication landscape, while geographic trends highlight China, the United Kingdom, and the United States as major contributors. Thematic evolution shows a transition from technical and region-specific issues to behaviourally informed, people-centered approaches, including constructs such as pro-environmental behavior, circular economy, and community engagement. Factorial analysis via MCA demonstrates a conceptual divide between theory-driven research (e.g., Theory of Planned Behavior, norms, policy) and empirically focused studies (e.g., surveys, behavior change, demographics), with central constructs like sustainability and attitude bridging these themes. This study consolidates the intellectual development of this interdisciplinary domain and offers strategic insights for future research in sustainable behaviour, environmental psychology, and global waste governance.
References
[1] S. Kaza, L. Yao, P. Bhada-Tata, and F. Van Woerden, What a waste 2.0: a global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank Publications, 2018.
[2] L. A. Guerrero, G. Maas, and W. Hogland, “Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries,” Waste Manag., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 220–232, 2013.
[3] I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections,” Psychology & health, vol. 26, no. 9. Taylor & Francis, pp. 1113–1127, 2011.
[4] A. Kollmuss and J. Agyeman, “Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?,” Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 239–260, 2002.
[5] I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991.
[6] A. Bandura, “Social foundations of thought and action,” Englewood Cliffs, NJ, vol. 1986, no. 23–28, p. 2, 1986.
[7] I. Kageyama et al., “Determination of waste management workers’ physical and psychological load: A cross-sectional study using biometric data,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 23, p. 15964, 2022.
[8] M. Tian and Y. Zheng, “How to reduce food waste caused by normative illusion? a study based on evolutionary game model analysis,” Foods, vol. 11, no. 14, p. 2162, 2022.
[9] O. Labib, L. Manaf, A. H. Sharaai, and S. S. M. Zaid, “Moderating effects on residents’ willingness in waste sorting to improve waste handling in Dammam City, Saudi Arabia,” Recycling, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 24, 2021.
[10] Y. Yuan, H. Nomura, Y. Takahashi, and M. Yabe, “Model of Chinese household kitchen waste separation behavior: A case study in Beijing city,” Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 10, p. 1083, 2016.
[11] A. L. Allison, F. Lorencatto, S. Michie, and M. Miodownik, “Barriers and enablers to food waste recycling: a mixed methods study amongst UK citizens,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 5, p. 2729, 2022.
[12] Y. C. Dai et al., “Why doorstepping can increase household waste recycling,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 102, pp. 9–19, 2015.
[13] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021.
[14] M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “A brief introduction to bibliometrix,” J. Informetr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017.
[15] T. Adarsh and H. S. KP, “Trends and insights in Nature-Based Solutions: A bibliometric study,” Int. J. Disaster Stud. Clim. Resil., vol. 1, no. 1 Jan-Jun 2025, pp. 22–34, 2025.
[16] S. C. Bradford, “Sources of information on specific subjects.,” 1976.
[17] A. L. Brooks, S. Wang, and J. R. Jambeck, “The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade,” Sci. Adv., vol. 4, no. 6, p. eaat0131, 2018.
[18] A. J. Lotka, “The frequency distribution of scientific productivity,” J. Washingt. Acad. Sci., vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 317–323, 1926.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adarsh T, Haneena Sulthana K P, Sandhya Aravind CA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com