Una Via Principle: Legal Certainty and Justice in The Resolution of Capital Market Criminal Cases

Authors

  • Putu Kanitha Putri Amaris Universitas Udayana
  • A.A. Ngurah Oka Yudistira Darmadi Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v3i06.1969

Keywords:

Una Via Principle, Crime Act, Capital Market, Legal Certainty, Justice

Abstract

The focusing aims of this research are to scrutinize and assess the characteristics of capital market crimes that are specifically regulated separately from general crimes in the Criminal Code and the setting of the una via principle in the settlement of capital market crimes in purpose to maintain legal certainty and justice. The problems that underlies include: (1) how is the arrangement of una via principle in Indonesian capital market legal system and (2) how should the application of una via principle in capital market criminal case settlement in Indonesia. With a normative juridical method, this research analyzes norms, principles and legislation related to the una via principle in capital market regulations in Indonesia, namely Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Markets and Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector. The conclusion drawn from this study indicate the existence of una via principle comes with the concept of selecting sanctions for perpetrators of capital market crimes aimed at providing justice and legal certainty. However, the regulation of the una via principle still needs to be improved because the current legal rules have vagueness which causes unclear procedures for resolving capital market criminal cases. Efforts are needed to improve regulations, increase coordination and collaboration between law enforcement officials, establish a transparent mechanism for imposing sanctions and conduct a transparent and fair trial.

References

[1] D. Sembiring, “Analisis Kebijakan Penanganan Tindak Pidana di Bidang Perpajakan Oleh Direktorat Jendral Pajak,” UNES Law Rev., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 9390–9420, 2024.

[2] H. K. Septiana, “Analisis Tanggung Jawab Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Manipulasi Pasar Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Investor Minoritas Studi Kasus: Posa,” J. Ilmu Sos. Dan Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 2, 2021.

[3] A. Suharsono and N. Prasetyoningsih, “SOLUSI MENGATASI DUALITAS PENGATURAN SANKSI ADMINISTRASI ATAU SANKSI PIDANA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG KETENTUAN UMUM PERPAJAKAN,” J. Yuridis, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 28–44, 2023.

[4] W. Yohanes and H. Yusuf, “DAMPAK TINDAK PIDANA EKONOMI KHUSUS TERHADAP INVESTASI ASING: ANALISIS KASUS KEJAHATAN KORPORASI DI SEKTOR INDUSTRI,” J. Intelek Insa. Cendikia, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 5095–5111, 2024.

[5] O. J. Keuangan, “Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal,” Retrieved from Otoritas Jasa Keuang. https//www. ojk. go. id/id/kanal/pasar-modal/regulasi/undang-undang/Pages/undang-undang-nomor-8-tahun-1995-tentang-pasar-modal. aspx, 1995.

[6] N. C. N. Rantetandung and I. D. G. D. Sugama, “Penegakan hukum dalam tindak pidana pasar modal, pencucian uang dan korupsi: Studi Kasus Jiwasraya”.

[7] V. Prayitno, “STUDI KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PASAR MODAL PADA PT RELIANCE SECURITIES, TBK DAN PT MAGNUS CAPITAL,” " Dharmasisya” J. Progr. Magister Huk. FHUI, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 9, 2022.

[8] E. Kustinah and F. Nisa, “Strategi Pengembangan Pasar Modal Syariah untuk Mendukung Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Syariah,” J. RUMPUN Manaj. DAN Ekon., vol. 1, pp. 240–247, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.61722/jrme.v1i3.1626.

[9] R. Kusumaningsih, “Peran penyidik Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam menjaga stabilitas sektor jasa keuangan Indonesia,” J. Res Justitia J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 26–41, 2024.

[10] R. I. Undang-Undang, “No. 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.” LN, 2011.

[11] L. Klimek, “Ne bis in idem as a modern guarantee in Criminal Proceedings in Europe,” Access to Just. E. Eur., p. 101, 2022.

[12] I. Yani and Z. Erma, “Bentuk Kejahatan Dan Pelanggaran Yang Terjadi Di Bidang Pasar Modal Dalam Investasi,” Marwah Huk., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 10–23, 2024.

[13] R. U. S. W. Wuryandari, A. Surono, and S. Akkapin, “Challenges For Capital Market Investors Post Effectiveness UU No. 4 Of 2023 Concernng Development and Strengthening The Financial Sector In Indonesia,” J. Evid. Law, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 601–613, 2024.

[14] I. M. P. Diantha and M. S. Sh, Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif dalam justifikasi teori hukum. Prenada Media, 2016.

[15] R. Soesilo, “Kitab undang-undang hukum pidana (KUHP): serta komentar-komentarnya lengkap pasal demi pasal: untuk para pejabat kepolisian negara, kejaksaan/pengadilan negeri, pamong praja, dsb.,” (No Title), 1974.

[16] S. H. Mas Rahmah and L. L. M. MH, Hukum pasar modal. Prenada Media, 2019.

[17] M. Muhaimin, “Metode Penelitian Hukum,” Dalam S. Dr. Muhaimin, Metod. Penelit. Hukum, Mataram-NTB Mataram, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 06 (2025): West Science Interdisciplinary Studies

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Putu Kanitha Putri Amaris, A.A. Ngurah Oka Yudistira Darmadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Una Via Principle: Legal Certainty and Justice in The Resolution of Capital Market Criminal Cases (P. K. Putri Amaris & A. N. O. . Yudistira Darmadi , Trans.). (2025). West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(06), 887-896. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v3i06.1969