Employee Well-Being Research Trends in HR Management

Loso Judijanto; Dasa Rahardjo  Soesanto; Rival  Pahrijal

doi:10.58812/wsis.v3i03.1781

Authors

Loso Judijanto IPOSS Jakarta, Indonesia
Dasa Rahardjo Soesanto Universitas Utpadaka Swastika
Rival Pahrijal Nusa Putra University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v3i03.1781

Keywords:

Employee Well-Being, Human Resource Management, Job Satisfaction, Work-Life Balance, Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

Employee well-being has emerged as a critical focus within human resource management (HRM) research, driven by its direct impact on productivity, job satisfaction, and organizational success. This study explores recent research trends in employee well-being using a systematic literature review based exclusively on Scopus-indexed publications. The findings reveal that key themes in HRM well-being research include work-life balance, job satisfaction, burnout, leadership, digitalization, and corporate social responsibility (CSR). The bibliometric analysis highlights the increasing role of psychological well-being, mental health support, and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in shaping modern HRM strategies. Additionally, the growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and technology in well-being management presents both opportunities and challenges for organizations. The discussion underscores the practical implications of well-being research for HRM practices, emphasizing the need for leadership training, personalized employee support programs, and ethical technology use. The study also identifies future research directions, including the long-term effects of remote work, AI-driven HR analytics, and cross-cultural perspectives on well-being interventions. By synthesizing existing literature, this research provides valuable insights for HR professionals, policymakers, and academics seeking to enhance employee well-being in dynamic work environments.

References

[1] S. K. Singh, R. K. Pradhan, N. P. Panigrahy, and L. K. Jena, “Self-efficacy and workplace well-being: moderating role of sustainability practices,” Benchmarking An Int. J., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1692–1708, 2019.

[2] I. Inceoglu, G. Thomas, C. Chu, D. Plans, and A. Gerbasi, “Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 179–202, 2018.

[3] A. Mäkikangas, U. Kinnunen, T. Feldt, and W. Schaufeli, “The longitudinal development of employee well-being: A systematic review,” Work Stress, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 46–70, 2016.

[4] K. Nielsen, M. B. Nielsen, C. Ogbonnaya, M. Känsälä, E. Saari, and K. Isaksson, “Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Work Stress, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 101–120, 2017.

[5] T. A. Wright, “To be or not to be [happy]: The role of employee well-being,” Acad. Manag. Perspect., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 118–120, 2006.

[6] D. E. Guest, “Human resource management and employee well‐being: Towards a new analytic framework,” Hum. Resour. Manag. J., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 22–38, 2017.

[7] A. B. Bakker, “Towards a multilevel approach of employee well-being,” Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 839–843, 2015.

[8] H. Huhtala and M. Parzefall, “A review of employee well‐being and innovativeness: An opportunity for a mutual benefit,” Creat. Innov. Manag., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 299–306, 2007.

[9] R. K. Pradhan and L. Hati, “The measurement of employee well-being: development and validation of a scale,” Glob. Bus. Rev., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 385–407, 2022.

[10] A. B. Bakker and E. Demerouti, “The job demands‐resources model: State of the art,” J. Manag. Psychol., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 309–328, 2007.

[11] J. B. Avey, F. Luthans, R. M. Smith, and N. F. Palmer, “Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time.,” J. Occup. Health Psychol., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 17, 2010.

[12] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford publications, 2017.

[13] S. E. Hobfoll, “Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress.,” Am. Psychol., vol. 44, no. 3, p. 513, 1989.

[14] K. Van De Voorde, J. Paauwe, and M. Van Veldhoven, “Employee well‐being and the HRM–organizational performance relationship: a review of quantitative studies,” Int. J. Manag. Rev., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 391–407, 2012.

[15] D. J. Terry and N. L. Jimmieson, “Work control and employee well-being: A decade review.,” 1999.

[16] R. Ilies, K. M. Schwind, and D. Heller, “Employee well-being: A multilevel model linking work and nonwork domains,” Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 326–341, 2007.

[17] S. G. Rogelberg, D. J. Leach, P. B. Warr, and J. L. Burnfield, “‘ Not another meeting!’ Are meeting time demands related to employee well-being?,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 91, no. 1, p. 83, 2006.

[18] M. R. Azizi, R. Atlasi, A. Ziapour, J. Abbas, and R. Naemi, “Innovative human resource management strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic narrative review approach,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 6, 2021.

[19] B.-K. Joo and I. Lee, “Workplace happiness: work engagement, career satisfaction, and subjective well-being,” in Evidence-based HRM: A global forum for empirical scholarship, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2017, pp. 206–221.

[20] E. Conway, N. Fu, K. Monks, K. Alfes, and C. Bailey, “Demands or resources? The relationship between HR practices, employee engagement, and emotional exhaustion within a hybrid model of employment relations,” Hum. Resour. Manage., vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 901–917, 2016.

[21] L.-C. Huang, D. Ahlstrom, A. Y.-P. Lee, S.-Y. Chen, and M.-J. Hsieh, “High performance work systems, employee well-being, and job involvement: An empirical study,” Pers. Rev., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 296–314, 2016.

[22] T. Vuontisjärvi, “Corporate social reporting in the European context and human resource disclosures: An analysis of Finnish companies,” J. Bus. ethics, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 331–354, 2006.

[23] M. Järlström, E. Saru, and S. Vanhala, “Sustainable human resource management with salience of stakeholders: A top management perspective,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 152, pp. 703–724, 2018.

[24] M. Zhang, C. J. Zhu, P. J. Dowling, and T. Bartram, “Exploring the effects of high-performance work systems (HPWS) on the work-related well-being of Chinese hospital employees,” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 3196–3212, 2013.

[25] V. Khoreva and H. Wechtler, “HR practices and employee performance: the mediating role of well-being,” Empl. Relations, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 227–243, 2018.

[26] G. Hewagama, P. Boxall, G. Cheung, and A. Hutchison, “Service recovery through empowerment? HRM, employee performance and job satisfaction in hotels,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 81, pp. 73–82, 2019.

[27] X. Zheng, W. Zhu, H. Zhao, and C. H. I. Zhang, “Employee well‐being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross‐cultural validation,” J. Organ. Behav., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 621–644, 2015.