Legislative Approaches to Drug Rehabilitation: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Policies Supporting the Reintegration of Former Addicts into Society

Authors

  • Wredha Danang Widoyoko Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
  • Siti Ngaisah Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
  • Diah Ayu Rahmawati Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
  • Haryono Haryono Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
  • Bagus Ananda Kurniawan Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v2i12.1553

Keywords:

Drug Rehabilitation, Socio-Legal Analysis, Reintegration Policies, Legislative Frameworks, Anti-Discrimination

Abstract

This study explores the legislative frameworks governing drug rehabilitation and the reintegration of former drug addicts into society through a normative juridical analysis. The research examines how laws and policies influence the recovery journey, highlighting critical gaps in anti-discrimination measures, public health integration, and societal reintegration mechanisms. Comparative case studies from countries with progressive approaches, such as Portugal and Norway, illustrate effective models for aligning legal systems with public health strategies. The findings emphasize the need for legislative reforms that promote inclusivity, support long-term recovery, and foster societal acceptance. Recommendations include expanding anti-discrimination protections, incorporating restorative justice mechanisms, and enhancing interagency collaboration to ensure holistic rehabilitation programs. This research contributes to the discourse on aligning law and social policy to address the multifaceted challenges of drug addiction and reintegration.

References

S. E. Rodríguez-Kuri and C. F. Cáceres, “Inserción social de usuarios de drogas en rehabilitación. Un estudio cualitativo,” Rev. Psicol. Antioquía), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 57–78, 2014.

F. S. de Paiva, M. L. Ferreira, M. Z. F. Martins, S. L. C. de F. Barros, and T. M. Ronzani, “A percepção profissional e comunitária sobre a reinserção social dos usuários de drogas,” Psicol. Soc., vol. 26, pp. 696–706, 2014.

H. A. Petrova, O. O. Zavarzina, I. P. Kytianova, and R. V Kozyakov, “Social and personal factors of stable remission for people with drug addictions,” Psychol. Russ., vol. 8, no. 4, p. 126, 2015.

D. Best and R. Hamer, “Addiction recovery in services and policy: an international overview,” Textb. Addict. Treat. Int. Perspect., pp. 717–731, 2021.

K. S. J. Linus and H. B. K. Hutasoi, “Penyembuhan dan Pencegahan pada Kecanduan Narkoba dan Zat Adiktif: Sebuah Tinjauan Pustaka,” MAHESA Malahayati Heal. Student J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 494–502, 2023.

O. Shevchuk, V. Shevchuk, I. Kompaniiets, S. Lukashevych, and O. Tkachova, “Features of ensuring the rights of drug addicts for rehabilitation in Ukraine and the European Union: comparative legal aspect.,” Juridical Trib. Juridica, vol. 12, no. 2, 2022.

S. T. Dols, “Rehabilitation and social integration in drug addiction: therapeutic circuit/Rehabilitación e integración social en drogodependencias: circuito terapéutico,” Heal. Addict. y Drog., vol. 7, no. 1, 2007.

S. E. R. Kuri and L. D. N. Méndez, “Reinserción Social de Usuarios de Drogas en Rehabilitación: una revisión bibliográfica,” Rev. electrónica Psicol. Iztacala, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 172, 2013.

C. Fry, “Public Health and Law Enforcement Regulation of Drugs and Drug Use,” 2017.

A. Cohen, S. P. Vakharia, J. Netherland, and K. Frederique, “How the war on drugs impacts social determinants of health beyond the criminal legal system,” Ann. Med., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 2024–2038, 2022.

A. Moniruzzaman, S. N. Rezansoff, and J. M. Somers, “The Relationship between the legal status of drug possession and the criminalization of marginalized drug users: A literature review,” J. Community Saf. Well-Being, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 140–147, 2022.

Z. S. Hamed, “Drug abuse as a contemporary social problem,” Iraqi J. Pharm., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 194–202, 2022.

N. L. Chayet, “Legal aspects of drug abuse,” Suffolk UL Rev., vol. 3, p. 1, 1968.

A. Uchtenhagen, “Ethical and legal aspects of interventions in addiction treatment,” Textb. Addict. Treat. Int. Perspect., pp. 809–822, 2021.

D. L. White, “International Drug Reform: Medicalised Harm Reduction, Cannabis and the Global Legislative Reality,” J. Drug Policy Anal., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 20180002, 2018.

B. Mostyn, H. Gibbon, and N. Cowdery, “The criminalisation of drugs and the search for alternative approaches,” Curr. Issues Crim. Justice, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 261–272, 2012.

R. Lines, “The ‘fifth stage’of drug control: international law, dynamic interpretation and human rights.” Middlesex University, 2014.

S. Hemeida and D. Goldberg, “Dismantling structural addiction stigma in law: Policies for systematic change.,” Fam. Syst. Heal., vol. 40, no. 2, p. 288, 2022.

V. J. M. Adams and N. D. Volkow, “Ethical imperatives to overcome stigma against people with substance use disorders,” AMA J. Ethics, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 702–708, 2020.

N. Szczygiel, M. Au-Yong-Oliveira, A. Coutinho, A. Rodrigues, and R. Lopes, “Substance Use Disorders and Reintegration–A Novel Perspective on Empathy for Those in Need,” J. Corp. Responsib. Leadersh., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 67–80, 2018.

K. K. Dineen, “Disability discrimination against people with substance use disorders by postacute care nursing facilities: it is time to stop tolerating civil rights violations,” J. Addict. Med., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 18–19, 2021.

J. Wogen and M. T. Restrepo, “Human rights, stigma, and substance use,” Health Hum. Rights, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 51, 2020.

F. L. Rwatschew, K. Langan, and H. Dent, “Embarking on Recovery: When Does Stigma End? Investigating the Experiences of Discrimination and Aspirations in Recovery From Substance Misuse,” J. Humanist. Psychol., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 301–322, 2024.

K. Lancaster, K. Seear, and A. Ritter, “Reducing stigma and discrimination for people experiencing problematic alcohol and other drug use,” 2017.

A. Cieza, B. Mikkelsen, and A. Ghaffar, “Advancing rehabilitation through health policy and systems research,” Bull. World Health Organ., vol. 100, no. 11, p. 655, 2022.

E. Herrlander Birgerson, “A real gap: consequences of defunding Tasmania’s reintegration for ex-offenders’ program.” University of Tasmania, 2018.

D. S. Trujillo Villalba, “Alternativas jurídicas para viabilizar la rehabilitación y reinserción social de las personas privadas de la libertad dentro de los centros carcelarios.” Quito: Universidad de las Américas, 2014, 2014.

E. Simmons, A. Kito, K. Thind, and K. Kuzmuk, “Investigation into the implementation of rehabilitation in the penal system,” 2023.

G. Greenwald, “Drug decriminalization in Portugal: lessons for creating fair and successful drug policies,” Cato Inst. Whitepaper Ser., 2009.

S. Anderson, “European drug policy: the cases of Portugal, Germany, and The Netherlands,” East. Illinois Univ. Polit. Sci. Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 2, 2012.

D. Widijowati and B. Daniel, “Decriminalization as a Concept of Protection for Narcotics Addicts as Victims,” Int. J. Sci. Soc., vol. 4, pp. 84–96, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.54783/ijsoc.v4i4.556.

Z. Aliyeva, “Innovation in healthcare management: drug decriminalization for reducing the health damage from crime,” Mark. i menedžment innovacij, no. 1, pp. 37–57, 2022.

H. Judd, A. C. Yaugher, S. O’Shay, and C. L. Meier, “Understanding stigma through the lived experiences of people with opioid use disorder,” Drug Alcohol Depend., vol. 249, p. 110873, 2023.

M. Addison, “Framing stigma as an avoidable social harm that widens inequality,” Sociol. Rev., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 296–314, 2023.

F. C. Long and K. S. Jepsen, “Situating stigma: an ethnographic exploration of how stigma arises in interactions at different stages of people’s drug use journeys,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 20, no. 19, p. 6894, 2023.

M. T. Walton and M. T. Hall, “The effects of employment interventions on addiction treatment outcomes: a review of the literature,” J. Soc. Work Pract. Addict., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 358–384, 2016.

K. Silverman, A. F. Holtyn, and R. Morrison, “The therapeutic utility of employment in treating drug addiction: Science to application.,” Transl. issues Psychol. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 203, 2016.

H. A. Jones-Sanpei and R. J. Nance, “Financial capability in addiction research and clinical practice,” Subst. Use Misuse, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 214–223, 2020.

I. Fauziah et al., “Employment barriers against people with drug use histories,” Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 19, pp. 109–114, 2011.

J. Ahmad, F. M. Taib, and A. Jan, “Employment of ex-drug addicts as a corporate social responsibility initiative: the malaysian employer’s perspective,” J. Entrep. Bus. Innov., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. p1–p1, 2021.

N. Clark, K. Dolan, and D. Farabee, “Public health alternatives to incarceration for drug offenders.,” Inf. authors, vol. 1, 1995.

R. E. Meyer, “Guide to drug rehabilitation: A public health approach,” (No Title), 1972.

I. Walmsley, “Drugs decriminalization: The art of governing drug using populations,” in Prohibitions and Psychoactive Substances in History, Culture and Theory, Routledge, 2019, pp. 190–208.

A. I. Scheim, N. Maghsoudi, Z. Marshall, S. Churchill, C. Ziegler, and D. Werb, “Impact evaluations of drug decriminalisation and legal regulation on drug use, health and social harms: a systematic review,” BMJ Open, vol. 10, no. 9, p. e035148, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Legislative Approaches to Drug Rehabilitation: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Policies Supporting the Reintegration of Former Addicts into Society (W. D. Widoyoko, S. Ngaisah, D. A. Rahmawati, H. Haryono, & B. A. Kurniawan , Trans.). (2024). West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(12), 2514-2522. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v2i12.1553