The Effect of Boundary Management on Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Work–Life Balance among Married Working Women in Rokan Hulu Regency, Indonesia

Authors

  • Yulisma Yanti Master of Management Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Pasir Pengaraian
  • Hendry Kurniawan Master of Management Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Pasir Pengaraian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsjee.v4i03.3175

Keywords:

Boundary Management, Boundary Control, Work–Life Balance, Psychological Well-Being, Married Working Women, Mediation

Abstract

In Indonesia, women who are married and employed still shoulder most domestic and care work, and the way they handle the line between job and home may shape how well they fare psychologically. Drawing on boundary theory and conservation of resources theory, this study tests whether boundary management (BM), measured as perceived boundary control, raises psychological well-being (PWB) both directly and by improving work–life balance (WLB). An online survey reached 300 married women employed in government, education, health, private firms, trade and services, or their own businesses in Rokan Hulu Regency, Riau, and the model was estimated with PLS-SEM in SmartPLS 4. BM was linked to higher WLB (β = 0.615) and higher PWB (β = 0.303), and WLB in turn predicted PWB (β = 0.473). The route through WLB was significant (β = 0.291; 95% CI 0.219–0.366) and made up close to half of the total effect, a pattern of partial mediation. Women who can decide how far work spills into family life report steadier roles and greater well-being. Predictable schedules and agreed limits on after-hours contact are practical ways for employers and local government to widen that control.

References

[1] M. R. Sulaeman and Kustimah, “Hubungan perceived social support dengan psychological well-being pada ibu bekerja,” J. Psikol. Sains dan Profesi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 52–65, Apr. 2024.

[2] Bisnis.com, “Tingkat pengangguran di Riau naik jadi 4,12% Februari 2025,” May 5, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20250505/12/1874487/tingkat-pengangguran-di-riau-naik-jadi-412-februari-2025

[3] M. Hidayat, M. F. Hadi, and Sutrisno, “Tingkat partisipasi angkatan kerja (TPAK) perempuan antar kabupaten di Propinsi Riau,” Mediatrend, vol. 12, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.21107/mediatrend.v12i1.2541.

[4] B. E. Ashforth, G. E. Kreiner, and M. Fugate, “All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions,” Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 472–491, 2000, doi: 10.5465/amr.2000.3363315.

[5] S. C. Clark, “Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance,” Hum. Relat., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 747–770, 2000, doi: 10.1177/0018726700536001.

[6] E. E. Kossek, M. N. Ruderman, P. W. Braddy, and K. M. Hannum, “Work–nonwork boundary management profiles: A person-centered approach,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 112–128, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2012.04.003.

[7] C. Mellner, G. Aronsson, and G. Kecklund, “Boundary management preferences, boundary control, and work-life balance among full-time employed professionals in knowledge-intensive, flexible work,” Nord. J. Work. Life Stud., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 7–23, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.19154/njwls.v4i4.4705.

[8] A. G. Wepfer, T. D. Allen, R. Brauchli, G. J. Jenny, and G. F. Bauer, “Work-life boundaries and well-being: Does work-to-life integration impair well-being through lack of recovery?” J. Bus. Psychol., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 727–740, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10869-017-9520-y.

[9] I. Suryani, “Dampak self-esteem terhadap psychological well being dimediasi oleh work-life balance,” Epigram, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 160–169, 2021, doi: 10.32722/epi.v18i2.4090.

[10] L. Hasanah and S. A. Pratiwi, “Hubungan work-life balance dengan psychological well-being pada ibu yang bekerja,” Socius: J. Penelit. Ilmu-Ilmu Sos., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 338–345, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.21297923.

[11] D. Novenia and C. Wibhowo, “Mindfulness, work-life balance, and psychological well-being in working mother,” Biopsikososial: J. Ilm. Psikol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 105–118, 2024.

[12] V. D. Septina and T. N. E. D. Soeharto, “Work life balance dan kepuasan kerja dengan psychological well-being pada anggota polisi wanita,” J. Psikol. Malahayati, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 141–152, 2023, doi: 10.33024/jpm.v5i1.8740.

[13] S. E. Hobfoll, “Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress,” Am. Psychol., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 513–524, 1989, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.

[14] T. Atan and H. A. Obeng, “An empirical exploration of psychological well-being’s mediating influence on work-life balance and employee performance in Ghanaian public hospitals,” Asian J. Bus. Account., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 169–205, 2024, doi: 10.22452/ajba.vol17no2.5.

[15] E. Shu and Y. R. Edward, “Work-life balance as the outcome of boundary management among hotel employees: The moderating role of goal-self concordance,” J. Indones. Tour. Hosp. Recreat., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 197–210, 2023, doi: 10.17509/jithor.v6i2.58238.

[16] R. E. Sari and A. D. Nugroho, “Psychological well being and family supportive supervision behaviors with work life balance in working women,” J. Psikol. Teori dan Terapan, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 48–60, 2024, doi: 10.26740/jptt.v15n01p48-60.

[17] G. E. Kreiner, “Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective,” J. Organ. Behav., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 485–507, 2006, doi: 10.1002/job.386.

[18] G. E. Kreiner, E. C. Hollensbe, and M. L. Sheep, “Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics,” Acad. Manage. J., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 704–730, 2009, doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.43669916.

[19] T. D. Allen, E. Cho, and L. L. Meier, “Work–family boundary dynamics,” Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 99–121, 2014, doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091330.

[20] E. E. Kossek, B. A. Lautsch, and S. C. Eaton, “Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 347–367, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002.

[21] J. H. Greenhaus, K. M. Collins, and J. D. Shaw, “The relation between work–family balance and quality of life,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 510–531, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00042-8.

[22] T. Kalliath and P. Brough, “Work–life balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct,” J. Manag. Organ., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 323–327, 2008, doi: 10.5172/jmo.837.14.3.323.

[23] J. Hayman, “Psychometric assessment of an instrument designed to measure work life balance,” Res. Pract. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 2005.

[24] C. D. Ryff, “Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1069–1081, 1989, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.

[25] C. D. Ryff and C. L. M. Keyes, “The structure of psychological well-being revisited,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 719–727, 1995, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.

[26] M. S. Fritz and D. P. MacKinnon, “Required sample size to detect the mediated effect,” Psychol. Sci., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 233–239, 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x.

[27] P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, “Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 879–903, 2003, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

[28] C. M. Ringle, S. Wende, and J.-M. Becker, SmartPLS 4. Bönningstedt, Germany: SmartPLS, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.smartpls.com

[29] J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2019, doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.

[30] J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115–135, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

[31] N. Kock, “Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach,” Int. J. e-Collab., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2015, doi: 10.4018/ijec.2015100101.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

The Effect of Boundary Management on Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Work–Life Balance among Married Working Women in Rokan Hulu Regency, Indonesia (Y. Yanti & H. Kurniawan, Trans.). (2026). West Science Journal Economic and Entrepreneurship, 4(03), 611-620. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsjee.v4i03.3175