Electronic Word-of-Mouth (e-WOM): A Bibliometric Mapping of Scientific Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsjee.v4i03.3076Keywords:
Electronic Word-Of-Mouth, Bibliometric Analysis, Social Media, Online Reviews, Consumer BehaviorAbstract
With the rise of importance of digital platform use, social media interaction and online consumer activities in decision-making and brand perception processes, Electronic Word-of-Mouth (e-WOM) becomes one of the active fields for scholarly investigations. In order to study the intellectual structure, research development and trends in e-WOM literature, the present study used a bibliometric analysis method. The data was gathered from academic database entries of scientific publications and were analyzed using bibliometric methods, such as citation analysis, co-authorship analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, thematic mapping and trends analysis. It was found out that the research on e-WOM was gradually shifting from the issues of consumer motivation, online reviews, and credibility of information towards more general issues like social media, user generated content, purchase intention, brand image and digital consumer behavior. Citation analysis allows identifying fundamental research papers that shaped this field to a great extent, especially in terms of e-WOM adoption, credibility and consumer involvement in it. The cooperation analysis shows that despite the global development of e-WOM research, the fragmentation of authorship, institutionality and inter-country collaboration still exists. Additionally, the thematic evolution proves that modern researches in the area of e-WOM is gradually shifting towards the issues of digital platforms, social media marketing, sentiment analysis and data-driven consumer insights. The present study provides a comprehensive look into the evolution and knowledge base of e-WOM research and defines the possible directions of future research related to artificial intelligence, influencer communication, recommendation algorithms and digital trust.
References
[1] N. M. Sang, “Corporate social responsibility, electronic word-of-mouth and customer loyalty in Vietnam’s banking sector,” Banks Bank Syst., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 38–48, 2022, doi: 10.21511/bbs.17(3).2022.04.
[2] Y.-H. Yuan, S.-H. Tsao, J.-T. Chyou, and S.-B. Tsai, “An empirical study on effects of electronic word-of-mouth and Internet risk avoidance on purchase intention: from the perspective of big data,” Soft Comput., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 5713–5728, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00500-019-04300-z.
[3] W. Rachbini, D. Anggraeni, and H. Wulanjani, “The influence of electronic service quality and electronic word of mouth (eWOM) toward repurchase intention (study on e-commerce in Indonesia),” J. Komun. Malaysian J. Commun., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 42–58, 2021, doi: 10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3701-03.
[4] Q. Yan, S. Zhou, and S. Wu, “The influences of tourists’ emotions on the selection of electronic word of mouth platforms,” Tour. Manag., vol. 66, pp. 348–363, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.015.
[5] N. Hemthong, C. Ruanguttamanun, A. Sukprasert, and Y.-N. Tai, “The effects of perceived justice toward service recovery on electronic word of mouth of four- and five-star hotels in Thailand,” Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 317–336, 2025, doi: 10.1108/IJQSS-01-2025-0028.
[6] D. Sohn, “Disentangling the effects of social network density on electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) intention,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 352–367, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01444.x.
[7] G. Craciun, W. Zhou, and Z. Shan, “Discrete emotions effects on electronic word-of-mouth helpfulness: The moderating role of reviewer gender and contextual emotional tone,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 130, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2019.113226.
[8] M. Tang and H.-S. Kim, “An Exploratory Study of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Focused on Casino Hotels in Las Vegas and Macao,” Inf., vol. 13, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13030135.
[9] H.-C. Kuo and C. Nakhata, “The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Customer Satisfaction,” J. Mark. Theory Pract., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 331–348, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10696679.2019.1615840.
[10] S. A. Jones, K. D. Aiken, and D. M. Boush, “Integrating experience, advertising, and electronic word of mouth,” J. Internet Commer., vol. 8, no. 3–4, pp. 246–267, 2009, doi: 10.1080/15332860903467664.
[11] M. Sohaib, U. Akram, P. Hui, H. Rasool, Z. Razzaq, and M. Kaleem Khan, “Electronic word-of-mouth generation and regulatory focus,” Asia Pacific J. Mark. Logist., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 23–45, 2020, doi: 10.1108/APJML-06-2018-0220.
[12] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021.
[13] N. Van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010.
[14] T. Hennig-Thurau, K. P. Gwinner, G. Walsh, and D. D. Gremler, “Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?,” J. Interact. Mark., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 38–52, 2004, doi: 10.1002/dir.10073.
[15] S. W. Litvin, R. E. Goldsmith, and B. Pan, “Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management,” Tour. Manag., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 458–468, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011.
[16] B. J. Jansen, M. Zhang, K. Sobel, and A. Chowdury, “Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2169–2188, 2009, doi: 10.1002/asi.21149.
[17] S.-C. Chu and Y. Kim, “Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic Word-Of-Mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites,” Int. J. Advert., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 47–75, 2011, doi: 10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075.
[18] C. M. K. Cheung and D. R. Thadani, “The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 461–470, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008.
[19] C. M. K. Cheung, M. K. O. Lee, and N. Rabjohn, “The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities,” Internet Res., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 229–247, 2008, doi: 10.1108/10662240810883290.
[20] M. Cheung, C. Luo, C. Sia, and H. Chen, “Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations,” Int. J. Electron. Commer., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 9–38, 2009, doi: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415130402.
[21] A. B. Rosario, F. Sotgiu, K. De Valck, and T. H. A. Bijmolt, “The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 297–318, 2016, doi: 10.1509/jmr.14.0380.
[22] C. M. K. Cheung and M. K. O. Lee, “What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 218–225, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.01.015.
[23] T. Hennig-Thurau and G. Walsh, “Electronic word-of-mouth: Motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the internet,” Int. J. Electron. Commer., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 51–74, 2003, doi: 10.1080/10864415.2003.11044293.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Loso Judijanto, Sintia Permata Sari, Tina Isnaeni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
westscience.journals@gmail.com