Mapping Intellectual Structure in General Management Studies Using VOSviewer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsbm.v3i03.2257Keywords:
General Management, Bibliometric Analysis, VOSviewer, Leadership, SustainabilityAbstract
This study explores the intellectual terrain of general management research using bibliometric research and visualization techniques with VOSviewer. Drawing on data obtained from the Scopus database between 2000 and 2025, examination graphed co-citation, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrence networks to unveil the topical structure of the field. The results indicate that the concept of the general manager serves as the hub node linking multifarious clusters of research, ranging from leadership and strategic management to talent management and career development, sustainability, and employee job satisfaction. The visualization reflects both the continuity of traditional concerns—leadership development, globalization, and strategic direction—and the aggregation of new ones like competencies, sustainability, and organizational well-being. These findings bear witness to the multidisciplinary nature of management scholarship, bridging human capital, strategic leadership, and global responsibility. The book enhances management literature through the presentation of an replicable and systematic intellectual mapping of the domain, which will serve as a valuable handbook for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to harmonize their agendas with evolving knowledge patterns.
References
[1] D. Vrontis, M. Christofi, V. Pereira, S. Tarba, A. Makrides, and E. Trichina, “Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: a systematic review,” Artif. Intell. Int. HRM, pp. 172–201, 2023.
[2] S. Chowdhury et al., “Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework,” Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev., vol. 33, no. 1, p. 100899, 2023.
[3] L. Kano, E. W. K. Tsang, and H. W. Yeung, “Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature,” J. Int. Bus. Stud., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 577–622, 2020.
[4] N. F. Richter, R. R. Sinkovics, C. M. Ringle, and C. Schlägel, “A critical look at the use of SEM in international business research,” Int. Mark. Rev., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 376–404, 2016.
[5] R. Varadarajan, “Strategic marketing and marketing strategy: domain, definition, fundamental issues and foundational premises,” J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 119–140, 2010.
[6] M. S. Sodhi and C. S. Tang, “Supply chain management for extreme conditions: Research opportunities,” J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2021.
[7] S. De Haes, W. Van Grembergen, and R. S. Debreceny, “COBIT 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: Building blocks and research opportunities,” J. Inf. Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 307–324, 2013.
[8] I. Alon, J. Anderson, Z. H. Munim, and A. Ho, “A review of the internationalization of Chinese enterprises,” Asia Pacific J. Manag., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 573–605, 2018.
[9] O. Lavia López and M. R. W. Hiebl, “Management accounting in small and medium-sized enterprises: current knowledge and avenues for further research,” J. Manag. Account. Res., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 81–119, 2015.
[10] R. Phaal, C. J. P. Farrukh, and D. R. Probert, “Technology management tools: concept, development and application,” Technovation, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 336–344, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Loso Judijanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










