Work-Life Integration vs Work-Life Balance : Tracing Generation Z's Preferences and Perceptions of Flexible Work Patterns in a Creative Startup Environment

Authors

  • Sakinah Sakinah Universitas Pembangunan Jaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsbm.v3i03.2201

Keywords:

Generation Z, Work-Life Integration, Work Life Balance, Creative Startup, Work Flexibitliy, Burnt Out, Mental Health

Abstract

In the work landscape in the modern world, it is increasingly digitized and the change in the work paradigm in the current digital era has given rise to new work patterns and the main approach to how Generation Z manages their professional and personal lives; Work-Life Balance and Work-Life Integration. This study aims to explore and examine the preferences and perceptions of Generation Z towards new work patterns, especially in the context of creative industry startups. By using qualitative methods and data obtained from interviews with Gen Z employees in several creative industry startup companies in Jakarta. From the results of the study, it was identified that the majority of Generation Z employees are more likely to choose Work-Life Integration preferences, which they consider to be more in line with lifestyle and lifestyle in this digital era. Such as the lifestyle of Generation Z in the use of technology that they can access and have and how they combine personal and professional activities. However, in practice, it is found that there is a need for clear and healthy boundaries so that this flexibility does not lead to work burnout, this study highlights how important the role of company management is in creating a balanced, supportive and adaptive work environment and policies that are supportive and adaptive to the needs of Gen Z which is certainly oriented towards the sustainability of young employee productivity.

References

Anoraga, P., & Suyati, S. (2015). Psikologi Kerja. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ariyanto, H. (2021). “Pengaruh Fleksibilitas Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Generasi Z.” Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Indonesia, 7(2), 122–131.

Asrida, R. (2022). “Preferensi Budaya Kerja Fleksibel pada Karyawan Generasi Z di Startup.” Jurnal Psikologi Talenta, 10(1), 45–54.

Badriyah, M. (2020). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Cahyani, N. P., & Wijaya, I. M. (2021). “Hubungan Antara Work Life Balance dan Kesejahteraan Karyawan.” Jurnal Psikologi Udayana, 9(1), 77–84.

Damayanti, S. (2022). “Persepsi Karyawan Terhadap Work-Life Integration di Masa Kerja Hybrid.” Jurnal Human Capital, 6(3), 190–198.

Dewi, L. K., & Prasetyo, R. D. (2020). “Pengaruh Pola Kerja Fleksibel terhadap Produktivitas Generasi Muda.” Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Bisnis, 8(2), 55–64.

Gunawan, A. (2019). Manajemen Perubahan dan Organisasi. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Hidayah, N. (2021). “Strategi HR dalam Mengelola Generasi Z di Dunia Kerja.” Jurnal Administrasi dan Bisnis, 12(1), 33–41.

Kurniawan, B. (2020). Budaya Kerja di Era Digital. Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara.

Maulana, R. (2022). “Studi Kualitatif: Preferensi Work Life Balance pada Pekerja Kreatif.” Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 5(1), 14–23.

Mayasari, V. (2021). Work Life Balance dan Kinerja Karyawan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Nugroho, S. (2020). “Analisis Efektivitas Sistem Kerja Fleksibel pada Perusahaan Startup.” Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan, 5(3), 80–89.

Pratama, A. (2021). Psikologi Generasi Z: Tantangan dan Peluang di Dunia Kerja. Yogyakarta: Bintang Semesta.

Puspita, D. & Hapsari, R. (2020). “Persepsi Work-Life Integration di Kalangan Profesional Muda.” Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 19(2), 94–102.

Putri, N. R. (2022). “Manajemen Waktu dan Keseimbangan Hidup di Era Digital.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 7(1), 56–63.

Rachmawati, T. (2019). Keseimbangan Kehidupan Kerja dalam Konteks SDM Modern. Surabaya: Unair Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Work-Life Integration vs Work-Life Balance : Tracing Generation Z’s Preferences and Perceptions of Flexible Work Patterns in a Creative Startup Environment (S. Sakinah , Trans.). (2025). West Science Business and Management, 3(03), 588-596. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsbm.v3i03.2201