Bibliometric Analysis of Climate Action

Authors

  • Loso Judijanto IPOSS Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Gabriel Amadeus Sitompul Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/sdi.v2i01.2726

Keywords:

Climate Action, Climate Change, Bibliometric Analysis, Sustainable Development, VOSViewer

Abstract

This study aims to map the intellectual structure, thematic development, and research trends in climate action using a bibliometric approach. Data were collected from a reputable scientific database and analyzed using VOSviewer to examine co-occurrence patterns of keywords, network relationships, and thematic evolution. The findings reveal that climate change serves as the central node connecting multiple research domains, indicating a highly integrated and multidisciplinary field. Three dominant thematic clusters emerge, namely mitigation-oriented research focusing on carbon emissions and energy transition, ecological studies emphasizing biodiversity and environmental protection, and adaptation and governance research highlighting resilience, risk assessment, and decision-making processes. The overlay visualization shows a temporal shift from impact-oriented studies toward more solution-driven themes such as sustainability, climate policy, and energy efficiency. Meanwhile, density analysis indicates that research remains concentrated on climate change and sustainable development, while adaptation and governance themes are still developing. This study contributes by providing a comprehensive overview of the structure and evolution of climate action research, as well as identifying potential directions for future studies, particularly in integrating mitigation, ecological, and governance perspectives into a more holistic framework.

References

[1] S. O’Neill and R. Pidcock, Introducing the Topical Collection: ‘Climate change communication and the IPCC,’ vol. 169, no. 3–4. 2021. doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-03253-3.

[2] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021.

[3] U. Nations, “United Nations.(2016),” Millenn. Dev. Goals Report. United Nations., 2015.

[4] L. Waltman, “A review of the literature on citation impact indicators,” J. Informetr., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 365–391, 2016.

[5] M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “A brief introduction to bibliometrix,” J. Informetr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017.

[6] T. C. Bond et al., “Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment,” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., vol. 118, no. 11, pp. 5380–5552, 2013.

[7] W. N. Adger, “Vulnerability,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 268–281, 2006.

[8] O. Hoegh-Guldberg et al., “Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification,” Science (80-. )., vol. 318, no. 5857, pp. 1737–1742, 2007.

[9] R. Ewing and R. Cervero, “Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis,” J. Am. Plan. Assoc., vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 265–294, 2010.

[10] J.-F. Pekel, A. Cottam, N. Gorelick, and A. S. Belward, “High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes,” Nature, vol. 540, no. 7633, pp. 418–422, 2016.

[11] G.-W. Bock, R. W. Zmud, Y.-G. Kim, and J.-N. Lee, “Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate,” MIS Q., pp. 87–111, 2005.

[12] R. Laxminarayan et al., “Antibiotic resistance—the need for global solutions,” Lancet Infect. Dis., vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1057–1098, 2013.

[13] W. J. Ripple et al., “Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores,” Science (80-. )., vol. 343, no. 6167, p. 1241484, 2014.

[14] C. Folke et al., “Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management,” Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 557–581, 2004.

[15] J. Rogelj et al., “Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 C,” Nature, vol. 534, no. 7609, pp. 631–639, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Bibliometric Analysis of Climate Action. (2026). Sustainable Development Insights, 2(01), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.58812/sdi.v2i01.2726