Digital Ecosystem and Business Transformation: Bibliometric Analysis of Global Startups

Authors

  • Loso Judijanto IPOSS Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/sdi.v1i04.2460

Keywords:

Digital Transformation, Startup Ecosystems, Artificial Intelligence, Business Model Innovation , Global Startups

Abstract

This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to map the global scientific landscape of digital ecosystems and business transformation in startup environments. Using Scopus-indexed publications and VOSviewer-based visualization, the analysis identifies influential literature, thematic clusters, co-authorship patterns, and country-level collaboration networks. The findings reveal four dominant intellectual pillars: digital transformation as strategic renewal, AI-enabled business model innovation, ecosystem-based capability development, and entrepreneurial resilience during crises. Network and density visualizations highlight “digital transformation” as the conceptual core, surrounded by interconnected themes including ecosystems, digital platforms, innovation, big data, and dynamic capabilities. Overlay mapping shows a clear temporal shift from foundational digitalization concepts toward more advanced themes such as sustainability, AI-driven strategies, and platform ecosystems. The co-authorship and country collaboration networks demonstrate strong research activity across Europe and Asia, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, China, India, and the Russian Federation. The study contributes by offering an integrated understanding of how global scholarship conceptualizes digital transformation within startup ecosystems and identifies future research pathways centered on AI, resilience, and sustainable digital innovation.

References

[1] M. Annas and V. Meilinda, “A Review of Indonesian Business Start-Up Incubator Models,” Startupreneur Bus. Digit. (SABDA Journal), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 86–97, 2023.

[2] F. Schiavone, D. Mancini, D. Leone, and ..., “Digital business models and ridesharing for value co-creation in healthcare: A multi-stakeholder ecosystem analysis,” … Forecast. Soc. …, 2021.

[3] A. Omorede, “Business in the digital age: Digital innovation outcome, exit and the founder’s start-up experience role,” J. Int. Counc. Small Bus., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2023.

[4] A. Azmy and A. Priyono, “Leadership Roles For Improving Employee Productivity at Digital Start-Up Company,” J. Manaj. Bisnis, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 16–27, 2022.

[5] M. Lavčák, O. Hudec, and Ž. Sinčáková, “Local and institutional factors of start-up ecosystems: Common and inherited attributes,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 10, pp. 1765–1783, 2019.

[6] S. Vrabec, K. Zorko, and V. Bobek, “Sustainable Start-Up Ecosystems in Terms of Capital Investment and Other Business Opportunities for Corporate Involvement–A Comparative Analysis of Hong Kong and Shenzhen,” Int. J. Econ. Financ., vol. 15, no. 6, 2023.

[7] S. K. Srivastava and R. P. Khosla, “Start-up’s ecosystem: a case study on DevX,” Int. J. Knowl. Learn., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 97–110, 2023.

[8] C. Ziakis, M. Vlachopoulou, and K. Petridis, “Start-up ecosystem (StUpEco): A conceptual framework and empirical research,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 35, 2022.

[9] G. Perdomo-Charry, S. Clegg, and J. Schweitzer, “Do start-up ecosystems foster start-up performance? The moderating role of network learning capability,” Int. J. Entrep. Innov., p. 14657503231169888, 2023.

[10] R. Stevy, I. Puspa, D. Widjaja, and R. Ongsa, “Analysis of Internal Factors for Improving the Performance of Startup Companies in Medan, Indonesia,” J. Madani Soc., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 2023.

[11] Y. Cheng et al., “The Prevalence of Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Among Children in Beijing Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.,” Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., vol. 12, p. 854505, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.854505.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Digital Ecosystem and Business Transformation: Bibliometric Analysis of Global Startups. (2025). Sustainable Development Insights, 1(04), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.58812/sdi.v1i04.2460